D&D Debuts Playtest for Psion Class

psion hed.jpg


Wizards of the Coast is playtesting the Psion class for Dungeons & Dragons. Today, Wizards of the Coast provided a new Unearthed Arcana for the Psion, a new class for the current revised 5th edition of Dungeons & Dragons. The playtest includes base class rules plus four subclasses - the body-shifting Metamorph, the reality warping Psi Warper, the offensive-minded Psykinetic, and the Telepath.

The core mechanic of the Psion involves use of Psion Energy die. Players have a pool of energy dice that replenishes after a Long Rest, with the number and size of the dice determined by the Psion's level. These psion energy dice can either be rolled to increase results of various checks/saving throws or spent to fuel various Psion abilities.

While the Psion and psionics have a long tradition in D&D, they've only received a handful of subclasses in 5th Edition. If the Psion survives playtesting, it would mark the first time that Wizards of the Coast has added a new character class to D&D since the Artificer. Notably, the Psion and psionics are also heavily associated with Dark Sun, a post-apocalyptic campaign setting that many considered to be off the table for Fifth Edition due to the need to update parts of the setting to bring it current with modern sensibilities. However, the introduction of Wild talent feats (which replaces some Origin feats tied to backgrounds with psion-themed Feats) in the UA seems to suggest that Dark Sun is back on the table.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Christian Hoffer

Christian Hoffer

If anyone thinks I'm crazy for suggesting the Psion could be for the FR book, remember the Knowledge Domain is getting a Psionic Themed overhaul in the book, at least based on the UA.

Also FR is one of the few settings with a none monstrous God of Psionics.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

If anyone thinks I'm crazy for suggesting the Psion could be for the FR book, remember the Knowledge Domain is getting a Psionic Themed overhaul in the book, at least based on the UA.

Also FR is one of the few settings with a none monstrous God of Psionics.
But would they spend 10 Backgrounds on Wild Talents...?

I simply don't buy it, this is not for the FR book.
 

But would they spend 10 Backgrounds on Wild Talents...?

I simply don't buy it, this is not for the FR book.

After BG3 maybe. We still don't know how many backgrounds there will be in the FRPG, nor spells, Feats, factions, etc...,

I'm not even saying it's the most likely scenario, DS still is followed by a general splat book, but it's possible is all I'm saying.
 


Ghostwise halflings are a culture, not a species.
The closest thing to the Ghostwise Halflings in Level Up are Halflings with the Twilight-Touched heritage gift.

Twilight-Touched​

You are blanched of both emotion and color with wide, alarmingly pure white eyes, and skin that is either starkly pallid or disquietingly sallow. There’s no hair at all atop your head or you have only a few bedraggled locks of hair. You form stronger communal bonds than other halflings, and can speak without the need for words. You have the following traits:

Darkvision. You can see in dim light within 30 feet of you as if it were bright light, and in darkness as if it were dim light. You can’t discern color in darkness, only shades of gray.

Telepathy. You can speak telepathically to any creature within 30 feet of you that you can see. The creature understands you only if the two of you share a language. You can speak telepathically in this way to one creature at a time.
 

If anyone thinks I'm crazy for suggesting the Psion could be for the FR book, remember the Knowledge Domain is getting a Psionic Themed overhaul in the book, at least based on the UA.

Also FR is one of the few settings with a none monstrous God of Psionics.
I don't think you're crazy, I just think you're wrong. The psion is going to be a centerpiece of the book it's in (much like the artificer is with the Eberron book), and it makes more sense in a setting where psionics is strongly setting-thematic (like Dark Sun, or Eberron to a lesser extent). And that's assuming that it's going in a setting book rather than an "Everything" book like Xanathar's and Tasha's.

The FR players book that's coming has better and more setting-tied content to include.
 

I mean, it's absolutely not - to hold that position you'd have to hold that the term species was, but species is the less-offensive or non-offensive replacement for race, so...

It can be used in a derogatory and racist way, but so can species. In fact, the latter is used that way vastly more often than the former.

I'm aware of the scientific use, and you are right, it is more accurate to say "it is used in a racist and derogatory way", particularly when applied to people (all humans being the same species). In the correct usage "sub" does not mean "lesser than", but it is still often used in that way.

I agree, using species causes problems too. Particularly in that is invokes "science" that is poorly understood. All dogs belong to the same species (canis lupus familiaris) despite massive variation in characteristics.
 

I don't think you're crazy, I just think you're wrong. The psion is going to be a centerpiece of the book it's in (much like the artificer is with the Eberron book), and it makes more sense in a setting where psionics is strongly setting-thematic (like Dark Sun, or Eberron to a lesser extent). And that's assuming that it's going in a setting book rather than an "Everything" book like Xanathar's and Tasha's.

The FR players book that's coming has better and more setting-tied content to include.
I think @Henadic Theologian may be right. Not that psionics is particularly associated with the FR, but because its not. WotC, based on past experience, have to take into account that the psion might not make it out the door. So they wouldn't want to base a whole book around it, that would then have to be cancelled. Slipping it as an aside into an unrelated book means it can be cut or replaced (e.g. with a warlord) without commercial consequences. It can always be reprinted elsewhere later. And they are not going to sink time and money into Dark Sun until they know the have an acceptable psion to work with.

I could be wrong, WotC don't exactly have a good track record of smart commercial decisions, but its an approach that makes sense to me.
 
Last edited:

But would they spend 10 Backgrounds on Wild Talents...?

I simply don't buy it, this is not for the FR book.
I wouldn't call it spending - it's pretty minimal work to create a Background in 2024 rules. However, coming up with that many variations based around the same theme would be difficult, unless you go into something very setting and faction specific. Having "fire mystics", "ice mystics" and "lightning mystics" might fit into a Last Airbender setting, but it's not exactly generally applicable. I would be inclined to view "Wild Talent" as one feat with 10 variants, rather than 10 different feats. The mutual exclusivity supports that. So any Background with Wild Talent will give you a choice of which one.
 


Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top