Search results

Self preservation can’t even override their inability to harmlessly pick fruit. It seems like the only thing with any override potential is their desire to spread.

If I'm understanding correctly, you're saying that since they don't work on some devices, they should be rendered inoperable on all devices? I'm not sure I see the logic to that. Edit: I just saw Morrus ask people not to use the Spoiler Tag in non-spoiler threads. I withdraw my confusion...:)

Witches have been trying (and succeeding, depending) to eat children in faerie tales for centuries. I don’t think anyone is trying to ban Hansel and Gretel. It’s all about the presentation. It’s like violence in movies. There’s a huge difference between someone getting stabbed in an action...

I believe the Pathfinder classes are tuned slightly stronger (if I recall). Although that may be just because they get the class edge for free. I ran it for a few months, and originally thought about ditching the classes. In the end, I decided the juice wasn’t worth the squeeze and just went...

Absolutely this. I had no problem with the adult material in BG3. But if a player tried to bring explicit sex scenes at a tabletop (for example), it would quickly be a fade to black moment. Even a comical npc scene, like the bugbear in the barn, would likely be too uncomfortable to bring up...

You may be looking too deep. Based on past experience, it could be as simple as “Supergirl is a girl! And she’s the main character!!! WTF!!!!!”

Alright, I’m obviously not the visual connoisseur you are :). For a one second screen shot (that looks like it’s been altered to increase brightness), I’m not sure exactly what I am supposed to be looking for.

Looks good to me.

Unfinished? It was an ominous shadow with a cigar. It was onscreen less than a second. I’m not sure how you got ‘unfinished’ from that. Unless you’ve gone back and watched frame by frame and saw more than I did.

It’s called a teaser trailer for a reason? Edit: it was enough to show for a number of people to go “It’s Lobo!”, without actually giving anything away. Come the full trailer, people will want to see the full look to see if they pulled it off.

Or it could be they wanted to save something for the full trailer?

It’s got my attention. I’m in, barring some disastrous follow-up trailers.

There’s no way they just suddenly merge all that content onto Netflix. Or if they do, it will come with yet another price increase. I’m betting they keep all the services separate, but then add a convenient set of bundles (at a slight discount).

I certainly hope so. I’ll admit I stumbled hard on the “can’t pick fruit” as well. That’s not killing, that’s the equivalent of giving someone a haircut.

I’m definitely curious. I’m always looking for a new take on starship rules. I’ve yet to find one that struck the Goldilocks spot for me between too fiddly and too abstract.

This was awesome, and I am very sad it's not an official adventure I can buy and run right now! Oh sure, I have most of the pieces (other than Curse of Strahd), but having it prepackaged without having to homebrew it would be glorious...:) Thanks for the writeup (and possible inspiration).

We celebrate it in October, with the rest of Canada. Not sure if that counts or not...:)

This is my take as well. I've got nothing against a new setting. But it would have to do something that none of the others were doing. And saying "it uses 5e!" doesn't count, because I can do that with Eberron, Forgotten Realms, and Greyhawk.

The question isn't if WOTC is at production capacity. It's if the market is at purchase capacity. Every setting splits sales further, unless you are positing that most people will buy multiple settings they won't use. Isn't that one of the reasons TSR went down? Each setting book sold to a...

Well, good news is there wasn't any YouTube ads. So, other than an annoying Prime logo in the corner, I didn't lose anything by watching it early.