Search results

Like Yoda would say: <<the shroud of the Dark Elf has fallen. Begun, the Drizzt Clones war has>>

I think that in worst case scenario, the DMG will have optional rules to start a "lvl zero" character. No need to worry... yet, at least.

I like this very much! It reminds me "per scene" of White Wolf game. It is nice to see that 4e was inspired by good stuff of other games: only by such sincretism can rpg improve!

Heh... what then about Orcus and Asmodeus being names of christian demonology? Consider also that both will probably be dieties in 4e! I wonder if that will be more a problem than Tiamat, which is light years away from its mythological roots

You are probably right, yet there's a problem: fun beats logic. I mean, fighter wack monsters to deal them damage: isn't kind of funny that cleric/paladin attack them to heal and boost? I know nothing about mechanics, so I can only guess that dedicated full round support actions are more...

I'll have Dragonborn in my first campaign, but not as a PC race. They'd work for me as playable race only with a good background or in a high fantasy setting. I'm sorry, but the world I'm already working on is not called Tamriel... nothing personal, DB.

I hope Blind Phoenix Speed is at least a Paragon Feat... way too powerful. (lol I love this generator)

Melan's right, that was offensive: only Italy is run by mafia! How dare you to import our Sicilian trademark... wait for Don Corleone to hear this (btw, what's your favorite animal?). Steriotipes are bad... both in real life and games :D

Gargoyles should have existed in Uo2 (or Ultima X)... And if you're taking WoW as the demihuman paragon, please consider the non pvp server: you go to the same spawn points, do many quests that are same for horde/alliance and adventure in same places. Oh, did someone say Shattrath? But apart...

Evolving from "Father Tolkien" is a good thing for our freedom of imagination... Yet I feel that every fantsy notion should have roots in our world's folkore, symbols and myth. From this prospective even the new family member Tiefling is ok (name apart)... but what about the dragonborn? Apart...

If you assume HP as a box with inside "health, dogde abilities, sixt sense ecc.", how do you explain healing in general? I mean, if a character with 5|10 hp is hurth as much as a 50|100 hp one, why does the latter need more healing spells?! The 100 hp guy shoul less hurt than the inexperienced...

25th Edition deserves this web humiliation, due to all their translation inaccuracies... as in rulebooks so in seminars... Now this is karma. (Unless, of course, WOTC is an evil money making company whose lackey 25th Ed. revealed too many hints of their diabolical plans...)

As much as Warlord sucks, Marshal isn't enough fantasy for me... being the name of the "prototype" for this new class isn't enough +1 vote to Warlord PS: we don't know if the Warlord may attract followers (as per the 3E leadership feat), do we? If so that may give sense to the name..

I'll assume you meant that "that WarlorDs will really be able to completely replace Clerics".. great, we're confusing those Warlock and Warlords even before 4e gets out ;) I find your speculation quite logic, even if I think that 4e powers and 3e magic will have about the same potential... thus...