Search results

How about this list: Frodo Baggins Samwise Gamgee Aragorn Legolas Gimli Boromir Meriadoc or "Merry" Peregrin or "Pippin" and... Bill (Sam's pony) Hmm... ;)

Maybe there are subtle differences between the two, but aren't mass cure light wounds and healing circle the same?

In D&D, good and evil are not just concepts (like in the real world). There are manifestations of good and evil that exist in the default campaign setting and many other popular campaign settings as well. In D&D, alignment functions as a game mechanic and influences gameplay in areas like...

Yeah, let's get rid of "save or die" spells; D&D wasn't easy enough. :rolleyes:

rangerjohn, why not actually try playing 3.5 before declaring that it has completely ruined your enjoyment of the game? Or just continue to play 3e or whatever edition of D&D suits your fancy. 3e rules won't self-destruct when 3.5 comes out.

Do shields negate a monk's evasion ability? If so, then does a buckler affect a ranger's ability to wield two weapons? I ask this, because not wearing light or no armor affects both abilities. A ranger can wield two weapons and equip a buckler, though he suffers a -1 penalty to attack rolls...

No alignment = no holy weapons. Use bane weapons instead.

Unless your diviner's prohibited school is Evocation, I don't see anything wrong with your diviner taking Spell Focus: Evocation as a feat. As far as I'm concerned, it's like someone in wizard's college majoring in divination and minoring in evocation.

If fear effects are what ail you, why not a ring of remove fear instead? It would cost a lot less than a ring of mind blank.

Try contacting Paizo Publishing instead of complaining.

Do you or do you not apply the two-weapon fighting penalties to your attack roll when making an attack of opportunity while wielding two weapons? What if you deliberately choose to attack with your offhand weapon? The "flurry of blows" thread reminded me of this question, because the flurry of...

It's from Todd Lockwood's Web site, too.

I disagree with this sentiment. A magical, or even just an unexpected mundane, solution can be just as, if not more, interesting, than the expected mundane solution to a riddle or puzzle, e.g., Alexander and the Gordian knot.

Why qualify the term "critical hit" with the adjective "successful" then in the burst and thundering special ability descriptions? That could suggest that a critical hit (regardless of whether it was successful or not) from a mace of smiting destroys constructs, but that a successful critical...

Since a critical hit can never be successful against a construct or undead, I would say no, it doesn't. However, if you disagree, I would still go through with the standard resolution of critical hits to determine if the burst or thundering effect went off, rather than just applying it on...

I'm still in "wait and see" mode. I want to know how the changes to spells like bull's strength, cat's grace, etc. affected the pricing and creation costs of magic items that confered the same bonuses, like belts of giant strength, gloves of dexterity, etc.

It is from the Greyhawk: The Temple of Elemental Evil Q&A #3 linked in the original message of this thread. G:ToEE is supposed to be a computer implementation of the Revised Third Edition D&D rules.

No and never going to do it. I play D&D, not FATAL.

Useless? Monkeys are excellent climbers with amazing balance. They can also hide very well. Didn't Tarzan have a monkey as his animal companion? Monkeys are no destructive forces of nature, but they can be subtle scouts. What level of encounter are you talking about anyways?

That is true, but in this case, both elves and orcs are fertile, not infertile like mules. It may be the case that the offspring of an elf and an orc is infertile and incapable of reproducing, but you can't infer that such an offspring couldn't happen by citing mules as an example.