Goblyn said:I see NWN is available for Mac. Is it good?![]()
TheAuldGrump said:I really liked this game. But then I have enjoyed every game that I have tried by this team. Fallout, Fallout 2, Arcanum... all excellent. (Especially Arcanum.)
The Auld Grump, my only problem with Arcanum - no matter how much I want to try a Magic based character I end up going Tech...
Welverin said:Depends on what you expect from it, based on comments here if you're expecting another BG2 you'll be disappointed, if you take it for what Bioware was going for (the RPG ecquivalent of Quake/HL, I highly modable multi-player game), you'll love it. Also people around here seemed to consider the expansion campaigns better than the one in the main game.
Gamefaqs and Gamerankings have all of the reviews you need to decide for yourself.
mattcolville said:I would not describe the Temple team as being "the same team" that did Fallout.
NWN2, which is being done by Obsidian (KOTOR2) with support by Bioware, will be 3.5e and is expected some time in 2006. Obsidian has a lot of the Black Isle people (Icewind Dale series).Goblyn said:My real hope is that this is the start of a trend of games using 3.5 rules, but not a trend of really buggyt DnD games. I see NWN is available for Mac. Is it good?![]()
drose25 said:For me, the user interface worked poorly. The screen would not follow characters as they moved so every time you moved the party to the edge of the screen, you either had to use the mouse to (very slowly) scroll up or hit the home key to re-center. The slow scrolling and screen centering issue was fixed with one of the patches.