You say that like it's a bad thing.Seeten said:The same tired thing you said 12 times this week?
I agree.Psion said:This is really is so very wrong.
Discussions in this forum like the fate of Paizo and other third party publishers would be of keen interest to folks principally interested in sticking with 3.5.
rounser said:True, but when the change is as trivial as a find and replace, they have no such excuse to fall back on. It's just them ignoring their customers.
Why "dragons tail cut is a bad choice of name, thanks for pointing that out guys before we let it through" and not "warlord is a bad choice of name, thanks for pointing that out guys before we let it through"? I could give a care about the name of a feat, whereas this is a whole core class.
The bizarre non sequiturs always put me in mind of a daytime talk show audience. "D&D Saga skills suck! I play basketball and there's no way I'm buying the new editon unless Belgium changes its municipal zoning laws. So there!"Henry said:Have you been there, recently?...some of the complaints I've read over there really, REALLY make no sense. I mean, almost "Timecube" levels of sense.
Hairfoot said:The bizarre non sequiturs always put me in mind of a daytime talk show audience. "D&D Saga skills suck! I play basketball and there's no way I'm buying the new editon unless Belgium changes its municipal zoning laws. So there!"
carmachu said:Only if you get the fan boys to stop with the "Its the best thing EVAR!!!!!!", then sure.
Otherwise...no.
If I have to put up with fan boys, you have to put up with grognards.
Henry said:Have you been there, recently?There's about as many complaints there as here, even outside of the concerns and criticisms forum they have, so their mods are also having trouble getting people to follow civility rules, too.
...and some of the complaints I've read over there really, REALLY make no sense. I mean, almost "Timecube" levels of sense.![]()