were they? you did tie them together by writing....those were very clearly two distinct thoughts. Misquoting me by mashing together two separate parts of my post as though they were one single thought is clearly not discussing in good faith.
what do you think the ‘And’ here calls back to? No need discussing ‘doing things like’ either, that clearly also refers back. The part in between that I omitted isn’t a different topic but more of the same.And "One D&D" appears to be going even further, doing things like eliminating individual differences in class spell lists for...no reason I can determine
So if this were meant to be two separate topics, you sure did not make it easy to recognize that
At most I misunderstood you (and I’d argue I did not), no need to accuse me of misquoting