Perhaps Rev has a real and actual problem. What he did might have been a way of expressing this.
It is true that what he did has offended the standards of the code of conduct, but remember that the code of conduct runs on artificial time intervals. We must judge his offense in respect to reality, not in respect to the code itself. This is why he has to have the right of a chance of defending himself. So, I think that any decision regarding his penalty has to be made after judging Rev's reaction with the chance given to him.
This helps to judge better and it also helps to reveal what ever other things might hide behind what has happened. A necessary condition for this process is that Rev must understand before defending himself what the penalties might be.
EDIT: I see that moderation has addressed this already.
It is true that what he did has offended the standards of the code of conduct, but remember that the code of conduct runs on artificial time intervals. We must judge his offense in respect to reality, not in respect to the code itself. This is why he has to have the right of a chance of defending himself. So, I think that any decision regarding his penalty has to be made after judging Rev's reaction with the chance given to him.
This helps to judge better and it also helps to reveal what ever other things might hide behind what has happened. A necessary condition for this process is that Rev must understand before defending himself what the penalties might be.
EDIT: I see that moderation has addressed this already.
Last edited: