Actions

[OldAzzDM]

I think the rule for actions should be changed to where you can make:

two standard actions (non-combat only)
two move actions
or a move and standard action

Rule: Two standard actions
As part of your action you may take two standard action and make a 5' step instead of a double move action or a move/standard. But if your first standard action causes an AoO you must make a concentration check of DC: 10 + damage or successfullay pass a grapple check. If you succeed you may take your second standard action and if you second (SA) provokes an AoO you must make a concectration check DC: 10 + damage + damage from the first 1. (the second check might be to much let me know what you think)


example: say your a cleric and your fighter companion is surrounded and goes down at the hands of an undead. He is a 5' step away from you. You try to turn the undead (SA) take a 5' step to reach him the use your heal skill to stabilize him (SA).

 

[Hypersmurf]

Moved to House Rules.

-Hyp.
(Moderator)

 

[Hodgie]

I guess the first question is why are you taking damage/grappling if it is non-combat only?

 

[glass]

I think you'd need to do some rebalancing with the spells: as mentioned in the old school haste thread recently, 2 spells per round is considered a really big deal.

But, if you did do the necessary rebalancing of spells, you probably wouldn't need your concentration check mechanic, so you could get rid of the standard/move distinction entirely and the game gets a little simpler.


glass.

 

[OldAzzDM]

non-combat as in you can not make any attacks duh

 

[Nifft]

non-combat as in you can not make any attacks duh

healn somene so's he can make more attack's is kombat duh duh duh

-- N

 

[glass]

two standard actions (non-combat only)

Oh I missed the 'non-combat only' bit. Rounds and actions only appear in combat, so your varient basically never applies.


glass.