Mista Collins
First Post
How do you guys want to handle action points? Here are my thoughts.
When there is a roll any of the PCs would normally handle (attacks, saves, majority of the skills, etc), just let me know at what threshold you would want to use an action point. For example, Mr. Fighter has a +5 attack bonus. In battle, he let's me know that if his attack roll (after modifiers is under 15, but over 11), that he wants to use an action point. That way, if the roll is too low or high, he doesn't waste an action point.
I figure rolls where the player wouldn't normal know the results (spot, listen, hide, move silently, disguise, bluff, etc), wouldn't warrant the use of an action point.
What are everyone's thoughts on this? I am now accepting comments, concerns, suggestions, and delicious recipes. All death threats can be fowarded to my enemies.
When there is a roll any of the PCs would normally handle (attacks, saves, majority of the skills, etc), just let me know at what threshold you would want to use an action point. For example, Mr. Fighter has a +5 attack bonus. In battle, he let's me know that if his attack roll (after modifiers is under 15, but over 11), that he wants to use an action point. That way, if the roll is too low or high, he doesn't waste an action point.
I figure rolls where the player wouldn't normal know the results (spot, listen, hide, move silently, disguise, bluff, etc), wouldn't warrant the use of an action point.
What are everyone's thoughts on this? I am now accepting comments, concerns, suggestions, and delicious recipes. All death threats can be fowarded to my enemies.