D&D 5E Adventures in the Radiant Citadel Interview

The other Angel stat blocks have it, so it just feels like a sloppy mistake.
It's not a mistake, it's the change of stat block format since the Monster Manual was printed. "Angel" is no longer a valid subtype.
And I think a setting book should have been done, then the adventures in a seperate book.
🤷‍♂️ It's an adventure book, and was always advertised as such. It was never going to be a setting book, especially not one with fourteen different settings in it. If you didn't want a book of adventures you shouldn't have preordered it in the first place.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

ECMO3

Hero
It sounds pretty cool and I can't wait to play it, but I wonder what people are going to think of it in 40 years? I think this is very likely to be one of those things that we cringe about in the future, much like Oriental Adventures from the 1980s is today.
 

Remove ads

Top