Zombie_Babies
First Post
So you bought comics about cyber-killer sex-droids?
Hell yes. Honestly, though, I bought that particular one for the other comic. Jim Lee illustrated the first issue of Deathblow.
So you bought comics about cyber-killer sex-droids?
I don't even think they mean that. I think that it just means she has her own title. The current Ms. Marvel has been around over a year but not with her own title I believe, so it isn't exactly a new person taking the name (although I guess in comic time scales being just over a year old is still counted as new). The old Ms. Marvel became Captain Marvel.
I don't even think they mean that. I think that it just means she has her own title. The current Ms. Marvel has been around over a year but not with her own title I believe, so it isn't exactly a new person taking the name (although I guess in comic time scales being just over a year old is still counted as new). The old Ms. Marvel became Captain Marvel.
I have one issue with the article it's self unless it's the just wording of it
Ms. Marvel isn't new to the Marvel universe....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ms._Marvel
unless they mean a new person taking on the name of Ms. Marvel....
I happened to stumble upon this article:
http://www.blastr.com/2014-1-8/get-set-host-new-marvel-comics-our-all-new-marvel-now-guide
I'm having trouble putting into words what's bothering me about this strategy. I get that #1 issues sell more. As a more casual comic reader who usually just picks up trades that interest me, my initial reaction was that I'm done with Marvel. I'm getting confused as to which books I'd need to pick up to continue following the characters I like.
Thoughts?
Carol Danvers is Captain Marvel now. Kamela Khan (sp?) is the new Ms. Marvel.
not a new person taking on that identity, to me as i stated above it sounds like they think that the whole character of Ms. Marvel is new.even a brand-new Marvel superhero (Ms. Marvel).
to me as i stated above it sounds like they think that the whole character of Ms. Marvel is new.
That's not the way the article is worded,which i said in the bit you quoted from me, in fact the article says the following : not a new person taking on that identity, to me as i stated above it sounds like they think that the whole character of Ms. Marvel is new.
unless they mean a new person taking on the name of Ms. Marvel....
Khan initially made brief appearances in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ms._Marvel_(Kamala_Khan)Captain Marvel #14 (August 2013) and Captain Marvel #17 (November 2013). She made her full debut in All-New Marvel NOW! Point-One #1 (January 2014) and is scheduled to headline the third volume of Ms. Marvel beginning in February 2014.
I don't really understand what you're objecting to. You ALSO said...
The word "unless" creates an exception to the preceding statement. The preceding statement was that the article was wrong because Ms Marvel was not a new superhero. UNLESS they mean a new person taking on the name of Ms Marvel, in which case the article is NOT wrong.
That is what they mean. A new person is taking on the name of Ms Marvel. That person is Kamala Khan.
I wouldn't even say she's taking on the identity of Ms Marvel, because identity is typically more than a name; identity would imply commonalities between the characters such as powers, origin, or such. None of those seems to be the case. She's not taking on the identity of "Ms Marvel, Avenger".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ms._Marvel_(Kamala_Khan)
So, new person, new powers, new backstory, new character, old name...what would you call her, if not a new super hero?