heirodule
First Post
WayneLigon said:Yeah, it couldn't be to avoid confusion about whether one was talking about the class or being used to refer to someone with general magical ability.
It could, but it seems like there's a lot of counter-evidence of a thoroughgoing effort to make the game sex-neutral. Lizardfolk, merfolk, spawn of kyuss. Tweet's writing on sexual distinctions made in gaming worlds seems to add to such a case.
And, yes, there probably plenty of women who may prefer their female-sex characters called "sorcerers". I just find it interesting that an actual female writer-writer (not game-designer writer) decides to communicate the D&D experience to other women and chooses to emphasize [puts it in the title] the term that makes the sex of the character obvious. But its a book that clearly is approaching D&D from the point of view of a member of one sex (not like the rest of us, who approach D&D from the default view of no particular sex)