mhacdebhandia
Explorer
Sure, but I don't think it's comparable.The funny thing is that 4e's philosophy of everything is core, makes me wonder about this. I mean, The Warforged appeared in Dragon (even though we knew Eberron would be the second setting released and that they were as intrinsic to it as draconians are to Dragonlance) and WotC had no compunctions about turning around and printing them again in the EPG.
First of all, warforged are a classic PC race. I'm sure there are PC rules for at least some draconians in at least the Margaret Weis Productions Third Edition material, but the better comparison would be to a Dragonlance-only race like, say, the kender.
Second, the warforged showed up in the first Monster Manual and had basic NPC racial stats there, then had a proper PC write up in Dragon - honestly, if you were going to see draconians as comparable, I'd want to see evidence of similar exposure and "promotion". I don't see kender getting this level of exposure, nor any other Dragonlance race (excepting possibly minotaurs, and the core promotion of minotaurs has been pretty focused on their classical, non-Dragonlance, Baphomet-worshipping or primal savage race schtick).
I think draconians are in Draconomicon 2: Metallic Dragons because a) it's the 25th anniversary and b) they're made from metallic dragons, so it's a logical thing to include.