As I said I am not an expert at this, so I am not sure how to do respond. But you don't have to respond so that is always an option. However, I will try to address this based on the post I was responding too:
---
Argument 1
Why?
Because it is offensive.
To who?
A monetizing youtuber and some Asians
- here the term "monetizing youtuber" is clearly negative and the "other". By association it cast "Asians" as negative and other
So not all Asians?
No, but they have been brought up to grin and bear it.
So their opinions on this matter are false or disinegenous?
- this idea of negativity & otherness is then reinforced by describing them as false and disinegenuous.
---
How to do this better? I'm not sure. I am not sure what
@Sadras is trying to say if not to slander (which I assume he/she is not trying to do). So I can attempt to re-phrase this, but I am not sure it get's across Sadras' point (because I am not sure what that is).
So here I go (trying to keep as close to the original as possible):
---
Argument 1
Question: Why?
Response: Because the product has some offensive content.
Question: To whom is it offensive?
Response: A person on youtube* and at least some Asian people
Question: So not all Asian people?
Response: We don't know the extent to which Asian people are offended by this content; however, their opinions are relevant and we should do what we can to understand and address all opinions/views on this product.
*Note: the personality in question receives financial benefits from people watching their stream.
---
FYI. To be clear I am not, at this time, advocating removal of the product. I just wanted to point out a less offensive way to discuss it.