Philotomy Jurament
First Post
D&D trolls are cool; I love putting the PCs up against them.Infiniti2000 said:The great connector for all the editions, of course, is the existence of trolls.![]()
D&D trolls are cool; I love putting the PCs up against them.Infiniti2000 said:The great connector for all the editions, of course, is the existence of trolls.![]()
ColonelHardisson said:I guess I'll sound like a broken record, since this topic has come up a number of times at least equal to the number of books the original poster claims is out there, but choice is good. If you don't like all the options - don't use them. Simple enough solution.
Hahaha! That's funny.TheAuldGrump said:Do you remember the good old days before we used dice? When we actually hit each other with sticks and threw rocks at each other? Boy, those were the good old days!
Then some jerk had to tie his rock to his stick and started this whole arms race thing.
The Auld Grump, as for fire, now there is a weapon of mass destruction!
Just try using only the 3 core books, or try Castles & Crusades, or even try another game like HARP, Savage World, or True20 (True20 has only three classes, no more, by the way!).Keifer113 said:Is it me or are there 38973943789 books out there to juice up characters? Whatever happened to having a good character be good not because of a "build" but because of background and history of play?
Philotomy Jurament said:Kill it? Nah. There are lots of people who like all the defined options and bells and whistles of 3E.
However, I agree that 3E is definitely a different game in the way it plays and feels. There are a lot of people who prefer the older editions.
...
If you're getting 3E fatigue, there are lots of other systems out there, not the least of which are the earlier editions of D&D. There's a surprisingly big following for the older editions. Check out Dragonsfoot, for starters. There're also newer games (often OGL) that mimic older editions and capture a lot of their feel. One of the more popular is Troll Lord's Castles & Crusades, which feels a lot like AD&D, to me.
...
Anyway, there's lots of activity (nothing like the activity around 3E, but still a surprisingly large and active community). Don't waste time bashing d20; just start checking out some other options. There's room for more than one system in the gaming world.
...
Real bards that could kick tail? You mean you played a real bard, the very first prestige class? And I suppose you liked Thief-Acrobats too? The 2nd prestige class or perhaps the first substitution level options ever printed.Keifer113 said:When all you could play were fighters, magic users, thieves and clerics? ( and paladins, rangers, druids, monks and assassins...and real bards. That could kick tail).
Yes. I’ve played since 1980 – *flashes certifications* B/ED&D, AD&D1, AD&D2, D&D3.Anyone remember
So, you mean pretty much like now? Except that now assassins are a prestige class, and bards are a base class (used to be the reverse). Barbarians were introduced with AD&D1 Unearted Arcana (by E. Gary Gygax). Only sorcerers are truly new.When all you could play were fighters, magic users, thieves and clerics? ( and paladins, rangers, druids, monks and assassins...and real bards. That could kick tail).
“Whatever happened to. . .”? That’s like asking “Whatever happened to drinking tea with lunch?” It’s still done. Who are you playing with that they don’t?Is it me or are there 38973943789 books out there to juice up characters? Whatever happened to having a good character be good not because of a "build" but because of background and history of play?
Prestige classes are at the allowance of the DM. Whiny players have always existed, and the DMG does not say PCs should have X amount of magic.I guess I'm getting crotchety in my old age, but I think this prestigeclass arms race is going to kill the game. And lets not get into the whiny players who demand their characters have X amount of magic items because the DMG says thats how much they should have...
Yeah.Sorry had to whine myself.