Are you worried about character conversion from 3.E-4.E?

[Emirikol]

See poll.

jh

 

[KingCrab]

I think they already announced that the new system would not be designed with conversion in mind and that people should begin thinking about starting new 4ed campigns one it is released.

 

[Emirikol]

I think they already announced that the new system would not be designed with conversion in mind and that people should begin thinking about starting new 4ed campigns one it is released.

So, does that concern you?


jh

 

[Darth Krzysztof]

As long as there are ability scores, races, and classes that have -some- resemblance to what we have today, I don't mind scrapping all the other details and rebuilding.

Plus, I didn't end my world when the last edition came out. It might be fun to blow it up now.

 

[Mark Oliva]

Behind the "Other" vote: Who's converting?

 

[megamania]

When I start a campaign I keep it to one edition. Mixing it up always leads to (sometimes minor) differences that bug me.


Based on the little I know so far.... the next few campaigns will be 3.5

 

[Dannyalcatraz]

I voted "Other."

As things stand right now, I don't have many 3.X PCs worth converting. I have some unplayed concepts, to be sure, but nothing I can't kit out in almost any FRPG with a bit of thinking.

My big conversion concern would be over a bigger gap than that.

My oldest running campaign dates back to the mid-1980's, and we haven't converted from the fusion of 1Ed/2Ed it was set in. I was just this month sitting down to work out the difficulties of translating a high-level Drow Druid/Ranger/Magic-User (very pre-Dritzzt, thank you very much) into 3.XEd- and there are difficulties a plenty- and this 4Ed announcement comes down.

*sigh*

 

[RFisher]

I voted for the second option only because I couldn't vote for both the first & second option.

 

[ZombieButch]

Not at all worried, because I don't have any D&D campaigns running right now.

 

[Philotomy Jurament]

Other: not converting/nothing to convert