The Sigil said:
That's where I say the "selfishness" comes in - we're so determined to have the market serve US what WE want RIGHT NOW to the exclusion of everyone else that we're blind to the fact that doing so hastens the market's demise. If we ask them to serve us WITHOUT excluding everyone else - i.e., we compromise a little and get mostly what we want - we can keep the market alive.
Believe me, I know very well the consequences of business decisions (I'm a CMA, senior financial analyst, and business school graduate with honors), and I certainly understand what you're saying. (ASCII graphs! Woo!)
And, as a consumer, my response is: "I don't care". Yes, I want (though do not expect, of course) the market to serve *me* and *my needs*. What do I care if it withers and dies after we (the older demographic, the one currently being catered to) quit playing or pass away? I'll be gone - thus no effect on me. If the market starts catering to the younger demographic (and assuming not to me as well), then that could be construed as the market withering and dying for me, and thus the same result. Therefore, *of course* I want the market to serve me and my demographic. I don't care about the others - having the industry survive while catering to a different demographic doesn't do me any good.
(Now, contrary to my post above, I am actually a fairly altruistic person. But *purely* as a consumer within this marketplace - well, consumers look out for number one. Should we/they? Well, thats a whole 'nother can of worms that relates to entire economic systems! Not appropriate for this thread or messageboard, I think.)
In any case, those are only my "wants". The market
will adjust itself to market conditions (though sometimes with a fair amount of pain...).