Storm Raven said:No, the rule is that good pitching beats good hitting, and vice versa.
And if you think the Yankees have "good defense" you haven't been watching the collection of immobile zombies the Yankees have been running out there all year. Jeter is slow, Williams should be in left field, he can't cover center any more. Matsui and the various guys they run out the right are adequate fielders at best, and Giambi has become a slow, poor fielder even by standards applied to first basemen. The only player on the team who is actually fast is Soriano, and he can't cover the whole field by himself.
And Yankees pitching is no great shakes either. Both Pettite and Wells have ERAs over 4.00, and Clemens isn't that much better.
Zerakon said:Can't we root for our respective teams without belittling others'?
Bill Buckner hate mail…Sirius_Black said:That's just crazy talk! But, what else to expect from a Sox fan?![]()
Krug said:That was a thrilling Cubs-Marlins game.. Cubs up 2-1! But a really tight, exciting series. should do wonders for baseball.
Jayson Stark wrote an interesting article (http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/playoffs2003/columns/story?columnist=stark_jayson&id=1634561) the other day about how good this post-season has been in terms of close games, and how baseball has perennially been really good in that closeness way over the last 8 or so years, especially compared with the NFL. However, considering baseball's popularity has steadily been declining while the NFL's has been rising, even with baseball having more exciting (statistically speaking, anyway) games, I'm pretty sure nothing will "do wonders for baseball" at this point. We baseball fans -- with the patience to watch a "slow" game like baseball -- are a slowly dying breed.Krug said:That was a thrilling Cubs-Marlins game.. Cubs up 2-1! But a really tight, exciting series. should do wonders for baseball.