My tirades against the realms?
Perhaps you have me mixed up with someone else?
I rarely get involved in realms threads and have said both good and bad things about the FRCS book.
KDLadage said:I have to admit that as much as I like Kalamar, I am rather surprised at the number of votes it is getting.
Nightfall said:I've decided you Kokers are just to darn kooky for me to convert just yet!![]()
arcady said:Kalamar:
It's the ONLY published setting that doesn't have ALL of:
Silly geography that makes NO sense.
Uber author-sex-fantasy-alter-ego NPCs.![]()
Silly oversized inconsistant pantheons.
No ethnographic cohession.
No logic to it's historical patterns.
Illogical trade routes.
Improbable status between power groups.
Improbable status between humans/demihumans and 'humanoids'.
A meta-plot so huge it changes every DMs game every 3 months.![]()
More house rules than you can shake a stiff kobold at.![]()
coyote6 said:I'd like to like Kalamar, but . . . it just hasn't grabbed me. Whatever hooks there are haven't snagged me so far. It hasn't sparked my imagination. The gods seem flat, and nothing leapt out at me screaming "Ooh! Hey, run this campaign!"
Arcady, what about it sparks your imagination?