dude. when has insurance EVER put a man back to where he was?And, presumably, c) insurance. I think she can live with him having to deal with higher premiums for awhile.
That's all part of it, yes.dude. when has insurance EVER put a man back to where he was?
Never. They will screw him down to a low pay out and he'll be in a Geo Metro because that's all he can afford with the payout.
That is P's point. She didn't pick a prick to rob. She picked a good family man who has a nice car. She didn't leave him a fat stack of bills. She didn't take a less nice car or find a jerk to rob.
That makes her the bad guy.
That's a good point. Thank you.The kids are there, in part, as a contrast to the infodump Yelena is giving about the Red Room and the number of kids it kills. She and Nat are discussing the destruction of girls and young women in a brutal program while kids are playing blissfully in the background, underscoring the warped upbringing and betrayal they suffered. Stealing a nice car from the guy’s body shop (we‘re not even positive it’s his own car) is kind of small potatoes given what’s going on. It’s not liked they hijacked the family minivan.
Stealing is wrong. Stealing from a family, a WHOLESOME family . . . seems more wrong. But allowing the bad guys to win, disrupt world governments, cause death, destruction, and chaos, continue to abduct and abuse young girls . . . that's a bit worse.Going back to Black Widow, something that's been bothering me a little bit is the portrayal of Nat and Yelena's theft of that family's car as no big deal. The movie makes a point of showing us that the shop owner has a) a fancy car and b) a wife and kids. Then Nat says she knows where the keys are, and the next thing we know, they're driving off in the poor guy's sports car.
Perhaps Nat made arrangements for the car to be returned to him when she was finished with it, but that wasn't shown on-screen. It's not so much that I feel it's out of character for her or anything. It's more that the movie itself presents this theft as just a means of moving the plot forward.
This isn't a huge thing for me. Just something I've been mulling over periodically ever since seeing the movie.
Definitely don't watch a James Bond film then! He does that stuff three times before breakfast!Going back to Black Widow, something that's been bothering me a little bit is the portrayal of Nat and Yelena's theft of that family's car as no big deal. The movie makes a point of showing us that the shop owner has a) a fancy car and b) a wife and kids. Then Nat says she knows where the keys are, and the next thing we know, they're driving off in the poor guy's sports car.
Perhaps Nat made arrangements for the car to be returned to him when she was finished with it, but that wasn't shown on-screen. It's not so much that I feel it's out of character for her or anything. It's more that the movie itself presents this theft as just a means of moving the plot forward.
This isn't a huge thing for me. Just something I've been mulling over periodically ever since seeing the movie.
LOL. I have seen every James Bond film ever made, and I can't recall any specific instances of him ever stealing a car from a family.Definitely don't watch a James Bond film then! He does that stuff three times before breakfast!![]()
that would make it worse, actually. As a small shop, without even multiple bays and doors, you know this is bare bones. Stealing a car from the small mechanic means he's gonna be liable to the car owner, who might be finger breaky.That's a good point. Thank you.
And you're right -- it hadn't occurred to me that it might not have even been that guy's car!