Theone0581
First Post
Okay so last week my group had captured this person and we wanted him to not escape, so naturally we had bound his feet and hands with rope. Well he was dominated by some spell and was trying to escape from his bindings and slowly but surely he was getting the job done (taking 20). Good thing we had caught him doing so before he broke free. So I come up with an idea to brake his arms so that he wont be able to use them to break free. Now imagine your wrists are tied together behind your back, and the only way your arms move would be straightening your arms or moving your arms up resulting in your elbows being pointed outwards. So what I do is brake our prisoners arms by inverting his arms inwards so that his elbows are pointing inwards instead of outwards....very painful experience. Well after I do that, I leave him alone, and go back to sleep. (This is taking place at night). Well our DM saying that yet again he attempts to break free out of his bindings, and that the person keeping watch notices that his ropes are loosening up. I question the DM about his situation, as I cannot imagine being able to move my arms at all with such a fraction, he responds by telling me that just because your arms are broken does not mean you cant move them, and that he was dominated which results in him obeying the task no matter how painful it may be. Well in case you were wondering what had happen next, we managed to restrain his arms again and took care of what we needed with him in the morning.
What do you guys think about what happen (in regards to the arms to be broken, not what you would have done) should the prisoner have been able to move in order to loosen in bindings or should he have been paralyzed in his arms?
What do you guys think about what happen (in regards to the arms to be broken, not what you would have done) should the prisoner have been able to move in order to loosen in bindings or should he have been paralyzed in his arms?