• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Brave New Planes OOC

Status
Not open for further replies.
Paxus Asclepius said:
They don't engage in open conflict, but are not infrequently involved in mediation; as noted, they have a vested interest in preventing destruction.

True enough, I shall edit my post some but I imagine that most of the others are not interested in playing diplomat. (Post edited.)

Pa, did you see this question? The sword that Brystasia just commissioned grants the wielder proficiency. Is this a magical effect or is it just the blade being completely and perfectly balanced right? I imagine the former, which mean that Brystasia’s proficiency with the blade could easily be taken from her.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

Brother Shatterstone said:
True enough, I shall edit my post some but I imagine that most of the others are not interested in playing diplomat. (Post edited.)

Pa, did you see this question? The sword that Brystasia just commissioned grants the wielder proficiency. Is this a magical effect or is it just the blade being completely and perfectly balanced right? I imagine the former, which mean that Brystasia’s proficiency with the blade could easily be taken from her.

It is a magical property, and thus as vulnerable as any other to suppression or disjunction. Signature items, though, are less vulnerable to disjunction than a normal item, owing to their stronger connection (and because it'd just be mean to disappear them like that).
 

Paxus Asclepius said:
It is a magical property, and thus as vulnerable as any other to suppression or disjunction.
Well I guess I should add that to the list of feats I need... Maybe I should look at the fighter class. ;)

Paxus Asclepius said:
Signature items, though, are less vulnerable to disjunction than a normal item, owing to their stronger connection (and because it'd just be mean to disappear them like that).
Sweet! That’s very good news indeed. :)
 

Okay, I think I'm finaly happy with my character... :)

A few feats got swapped.
Combat Expert (6th feat) --> Two-Weapon Fighting
Stunning Beauty DC: 29 (7th feat) ---> Improved Two-Weapon Fighting

But this will lead up to perfect Two-Weapon Fighting, and from their I have a few other ideas but I should at least be more effective for the party this way but don’t expect any offensive spells. :D
 

If we're swapping out feats, can I swap out Improved Initiative?

In that case, I would have taken Weapon Focus as a pre-level 20 feat, and take Overwhelming Critical as my 21st level epic feat.
 

BS,

If you intend to dual wield, you may want to consider the ambidexterity feat, otherwise you are going to have a hard time hitting with your off hand. (Unless, of course, I am missing something.)
 

Wrahn said:
If you intend to dual wield, you may want to consider the ambidexterity feat, otherwise you are going to have a hard time hitting with your off hand. (Unless, of course, I am missing something.)
Ambidexterity went the way of dinosaurs and the dodo with 3.5. It's simply extinct. :)
 
Last edited:


Brother Shatterstone said:
Ambidexterity went the way of dinosaurs and the dodo with 3.5. It's simply extinct. :)

You're right, I should stop looking at the minutea and start looking at the big picture. I wonder if that is in response to making Power attack more powerful for the two handers.
 
Last edited:

Wrahn said:
You're right, I should stop looking at the minutea and start looking at the big picture. I wonder if that is in response to making Power attack more powerful for the two handers.
No big deal I double check to make sure it's truly gone once or twice myself. I think it's gone simply because it's take so many feats to do it. I mean even with perfect two-weapon fighting you still have a negative for using a weapon in your off hand. (Usually a -2 cause it's usually small.)
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top