Dissenter said:
I didn't realize I would recieve such a vehement, and utterly ridiculous reply.
You obviously haven't thought about the situation at all. Here are examples to back my position. With our current system of laws do we endorse assassination? No. Do we endorse vigilantism? No. Even when they seem utterly and completely warrented, it is still illegal to assassinate someone. If someone were to approach the police and say they had shot the 'serial killer of the era' would they be given a medal? Heck no, they would be thrown in jail and prosecuted.
I see the game you are playing now, it's called Payrolls and Paychecks. You want the room 3 doors down on the left. This is a Fantasy Setting. With enough cash you can buy a knighthood, and dispense High, Low and Medium? Justice pretty much at whim.
Hey who put the Real World in my Peanut Butter?! Who put Peanut Butter in my Real World?!
or something like that.....
Who gives you the right to pronounce someone a 'bad guy' without witnessing their actions, or giving them a fair trial?
The same right you have to puch the other guy after he punches you. It's all a matter of scale. If you Puch me I Punch back. If you Stab me, then you just lost your Breathing Rights. If you stab someone else and I take offense to it, you may also have lost your Breathing Rights. If you Cheat on your Taxes, and I dont like you, I may rat you out, then again, its kinda petty so who cares. If I see you kick a dog, I prolly won't even cross the street to talk to you. It's kind of a Sliding Scale.
Seems like you are putting the Cart in front of the Horse. When the "Bad Guy" doesn't do anything to you, then he wasn't labled the bad guy in the first place. You didn't even know about him! Of course there's always the story of the Evil Person living in that old abandoned Mine Shaft the farmers may tell you about. Maybey you aught to stop by and say "Hi". See if he needs anything offer to help. If nothings going on, stay near town for a few days just to make shure.
You are also forgetting a few things. We're talking about Buffing, Scrying and Teleport. If you have these spells you also have Detect Evil, Augury, Commune, Discen Lies, and Divination. You can tell the "Bad Guys" who're in need of the time and effort that justifies a visit from the Death Fairy, from the "Not So Bad Guys" who just need a little encouragement or help.
And by what you wrote, it seems you are still playing the black and white 'good guy' 'bad guy' dnd that so many of us left behind. If you want to make it that concrete, fine. Personally I like to add a little...make that a lot of depth to my games.
(Reading, taking note of the backhanded insult about depth, no sweat, he doesn't mean me)
Actions that may be justified still don't make them ethically correct. If you want to play a character without ethics, fine...I would say you are embracing societal chaos ( i.e. chaotic ). If you want to play a character with ethics then such a character would seriously think twice about stabbing the black and white 'bad guy' while he is in the privy. Frankly its unprofessional. How can you call yourself a combatant/adventurer/archmage or whatever when all you have really become is a glorified assassin. And where do you draw the line about which 'bad guy's' throat you are going to cut in their sleep? This guy killed and robbed a merchant, does this mean hes dead? This guy robbed a tavern does he get the strike team gack? This guy cheated on his taxes, does he get it? Children who might have skipped school that day will tremble in their sleep thinking the self justified strike team is scrying on them right now.
(2nd time he's asked the same question, wasted a whole paragraph doing so, notes Dissenter thinks that slaying evil is a profession with specific rules to follow, also notes that he has forgotten there are 8 other alignments than LG)
Even without the ethical dilemia of becoming the judge jury and executioner, it is still about fair play, and what is considered professional. Lawful characters would presumably fight with some kind of code of honor, whatever that might be. The same guy who would let a disarmed opponent pick up his sword is the same guy who would recoil in horror at the mages mention of the buffscrytel attack. Apparently you have never heard of the term honor before, so this is probably not making any sense to you.
(talking down to me again, backhanded insult about not understanding honor, noting Dissenters erroneous assumption that everyone plays the same LG character who would do those silly things)
That aside, its also about opening pandoras box. If this becomes common practice your PC's should be dead within 3-4 buffscrytels. Every 'bad guy' on the face of the planet will fear the strike teams imminent arrival, find the nearest wizard and buffscrytel gack you in the shower. However I would bet that you are playing the type of dnd where the PC's never take off their clothes, and even go to public functions armed and armored.
simple ethics 101.
(realizing Dissenter forgets Dectect Law/Chaos/Good/Evil are 1st level spells, again he forgets about the other 8 alignments, another poorly aimed insult this time of what type of DnD I'm playing)
Wow! What a Immensely Huge Straw Man. That must have taken you hours to construct.
You seem to think that every one is playing using the same Campaign Setting you are using. One where every major Govt is Lawful Good Anal. You are leaving out a startling number of valid settings. The Crusades, The Wild West, The New World, The Undiscovered Country, The Explorers of the Ancient Ruins, the list goes on and on.
If you ever find yourself looking for something more, try throwing some real life issues into your game.
Gee thanks But I'm already playing payrolls and Paychecks It's kinda boring. Things are looking up though, in a few Weeks I'm going to use my +30 Voting skill. Wish me Luck.
If you get tired of playing you might want to try AD&D. I wish you Luck.
Metalsmith