One student this semester did a presentation on the connections between Lost and Buffy, based on a writer in common to both series. Do you think there's much there? I'm only really familiar with the first season...
Got anything I could read of yours? If you want something of mine, try this one, on Buffy's opening title sequence: Slayage 22: Kociemba
or this one, on The Wish: Slayage 23: Kociemba
That would be my issue as well. The multiple authorship of the medium at every level troubles a lot of the assumptions that inform traditional criticism, and I don't really see that reflected in any of these anthologies (although granted, it's a methodological issue and would require some interpretive gymnastics to connect to the show proper).I am much more concerned with narrative unity/plurality that emerges from multiple authors writing what is "supposed to be" a coherent continuity
Much where? In LOST? Definitely.
If you mean a comparison of Lost and Buffy - I don't know.
Honestly, haven't paid that much attention to what individual writers do - I am much more concerned with narrative unity/plurality that emerges from multiple authors writing what is "supposed to be" a coherent continuity (I write about superhero comics, too).
That would be my issue as well. The multiple authorship of the medium at every level troubles a lot of the assumptions that inform traditional criticism, and I don't really see that reflected in any of these anthologies (although granted, it's a methodological issue and would require some interpretive gymnastics to connect to the show proper).
I think TV, movies, comics, video games, etc. just literalize some of the problems all academic critics are (or should be) dealing with at this point. Instead of a philosophical critique of the subject that makes Joe Everydude go "hwha?", we actually have multiple independent creators involved at all levels of the process,* which forces us to reexamine how we value and what we value about these texts in a more concrete and practical way. If nothing else it's a fantastic remedy to the Romantic notion of art as the spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings, the overflowing of the soul, and other such trite nonsense.I agree. It makes television studies exponentially more complex, but possibly more accurate as well. The metaphor that I've liked is that creators like Whedon are catalysts as well as artists. They serve as a Muse. After all, what makes Team Whedon (in ain't it cool's phrase) Team Whedon is that Whedon can delegate as well as write and produce.
Absolutely. I was thinking of production, direction, acting, editing, etc. in addition to the writing.Not to mention that if we take communal authorship seriously, then the performers start to look like creators as well, which makes for some very interesting canon issues around the comics.