Marimmar
First Post
Well, the cleric lvl 11 was surprised by the trap being sprung on her, she rolled badly on her 1st save and had no neutralize poison prepared. She drank an antidote potion but rolled even worse on her second save and took another 11 Con damage.
I (as the DM) let her live on the reasoning that:
a) An ability score cannot be drained below 0
b) An amulet of health +2 wouldn't be affected by the poison so it would grant the bonus even though the total poison Con damage exceeded the modified Con score of the cleric. So I thought she had 0+2 Con.
In retrospect I find it too powerful since no effect that is based on damaging Con would ever be able to kill someone with an amulet of health, thus effectively negating the power of Con draining/damaging effects.
This is why I asked around here to see some other opinions and thus far I'm pleased by the comments though I'm still missing something backed by the rules/FAQ/other source. Something that would help me argue.
~Marimmar
I (as the DM) let her live on the reasoning that:
a) An ability score cannot be drained below 0
b) An amulet of health +2 wouldn't be affected by the poison so it would grant the bonus even though the total poison Con damage exceeded the modified Con score of the cleric. So I thought she had 0+2 Con.
In retrospect I find it too powerful since no effect that is based on damaging Con would ever be able to kill someone with an amulet of health, thus effectively negating the power of Con draining/damaging effects.
This is why I asked around here to see some other opinions and thus far I'm pleased by the comments though I'm still missing something backed by the rules/FAQ/other source. Something that would help me argue.
~Marimmar