Tony Vargas
Legend
kreynolds said:
However, you can't be tried for murder if there isn't a body. In the eyes of the victim, this is probably a really "retarded" law, as I imagine they would want their killer brought to justice, but does that change anything? No.
AFAIK, the haebeas corpus requirement doesn't call for an actual body, just sufficient evidence that the crime happened. And, well, there are lots of situations where the law or how it aplies isn't perfectly clear - that's why you have courts, judges, and (ugh) congress, to interpret and even change the laws.
Now, it doesn't take a legal scholar to recognize a bad rule, nor a judge to re-interpret one, nor a majority of supreme court justices to strike one down, nor an act of congress to change one, so why play with a crappy rule? They're easy enough to fix.
And, yeah, most DMs end up dealing with broke rules more often than perfect players. ;( Do count yourself lucky on that score.
I've GM'd for the full spectrum of gamers. From the saintly ones who wouldn't powergame to save thier own lives, let alone thier characters, to the more common sort who'll powergame enough to create effective characters, to those that can't stop powergaming to save thier own lives, to those who don't know the rules well enough /to/ powergame. If you have no problem with broken rules ever being exploited, your group is probably made up entirely of the first and last sort... in what proportions I have no idea.
