Piratecat said:
A few thoughts on my last entry.
The giraffe was a reject - beautiful, but very hard to tie to a story - so I ended up using it as window dressing.
i am glad to hear this. i have believed for a long time that "blank" pictures like that make the hardest pics to deal with.
almost anything can be happening in a pic and people find it easy to use. almost any character can be thrown at these writers and they are on it.
but there is a certain catergory of what i htink of as "static" pictures that i keep in a seperate file, the ones that are great pics, but seem hard to use. i have seen great writers stumble on them and seen mediocre writiers really be drawn out by them.
i always like the feedback on pic use because it shows that we tend tos ee things very universally. i love the commoness that is shown amongst us by art as amuch as i love the individuality.
i THINK the key with such pictures is to focus on somethig that isn't the focus. have a settign with a giraffe, but have the text be about how the odd fog arose, or about the trees.
i think i miss a lot of references in these stories, when read other peoples reviews i always think "i don't rememebr that!" peanut references, mythology references- ZOOM, right over my head. but what people draw from these pics seems an amorphous and hard to discuss art, and i like those
i worry about the fact that someone else is gonna do one. i worry that they won't have THAT feel. and then i realize that whoever it is will have their feel, and that is a good thing.
wow, i went on a bit there, didn't i?