Vraille Darkfang said:
Is the east coast really that bad?
As Queen D already said: yeah, it really is.
Pretty much any major urban area has awful traffic these days. Until you actually have to drive in such an area, it's hard to comprehend -- I moved to the Chicago area from Green Bay, WI, then Madison, WI...and I had
no idea of how bad traffic could be.
It's 16 miles from my house to my office, in downtown Chicago; most of that is on an interstate. According to switchboard.com, that's a 21-minute drive (and, I suppose, maybe it would be at 3 a.m.). Realistically, it's at least a 45-minute drive during rush hour, and it can frequently take well over an hour. Heaven forbid you try and drive it if it's snowing...2 hours, easily. (This is why I'm very thankful that taking the train is an option for me; I rarely drive to work unless I need to have the car for some reason, like driving to an off-site meeting.)
The East Coast is often even worse. The cities are older, the downtown areas are smaller, and many of the roads are 200+ years old -- they're narrow, and often not laid out in a straightforward fashion (since they're often old horse-and-cart roads).
Washington DC has several other problems, in addition. The area is cut in half by the Potomac River, and there are precious few bridges across the Potomac, thus making those bridges enormous bottlenecks. In addition to the offices serving the government, there's been a lot of high-tech growth in suburban DC, and housing has just sprawled in the area, with the infrastructure (roads, mass transit) being strained to keep up.