We are having a debate about a potential tool and I think it is fair for me to give my opinion. Like I said before, if you want to use it fine. But I don't want to, and I have reasons for not wanting to use it I think other people might want to pay attention to. Again, I don't like talking about personal stuff like this, but I have had PTSD and I've dealt with mental illness in my family. While tools like this might seem like a good idea. I would argue they do have a down side. And that downside is they can be used as a weapon by people who exploit their own mental illness or trauma, in order to control the terms of conversation in a group. This is something I've seen first hand with mental illness, where their reality slowly becomes the reality of those around them. I think you always need to reserve the ability debate the merits of someone saying they have a problem with X being present. Maybe I am not doing a good job of conveying my opinion here. I don't know. But I can instantly see all the problems that might arise from a checklist like this, just from my own experiences with this stuff. So I don't think it is reactionary or dismissive. It comes from a place of understanding it isn't always a good idea to bend into these things.Look, this might work great .... for you! But that's kind of the problem, innit? Setting yourself up as arbiter as to what constitutes real harm, and what doesn't? I mean, this is some 1950s stuff. Or even earlier (shell shock can't be real! man up!).