JoeGKushner
Adventurer
If Scott's replying to questions, can he answer this one.
Have the PDF's been updated with the errata as it currently stands now?
Have the PDF's been updated with the errata as it currently stands now?
If Scott's replying to questions, can he answer this one.
Have the PDF's been updated with the errata as it currently stands now?
No they are the same files as the books in print now.
Ultimately, you as a consumer will prove me right or wrong.
Sure thing.Hmm. I busted TB for snark? Could you maybe point that out? I agree with the previous posters, you seem a might bit touchy today. Perhaps decaf?
You know, there is a reason there is both a Walmart and Tiffany's. Or Kia and BMW. Its all about what you value, what you're willing to pay ... and if you're capable of paying for it. Consider, for a moment, that you're simply not the target market. Do you similarly snark at someone for buying a Rolex? Or a BMW?
The fact that so many folks here have their panties in such a wad over the price of gaming PDFs (luxury items!)
No, I think buying both a PDF and and physical copy of a book at full price is irresponsible.You seem to think that buying both a PDF and physical copy of a book is "irresponsible". I don't think owning copies of each are - nor do I think your example above is relevant. Two copies of a movie offer you the same thing. A PDF and a physical book may have the same content, but offer different benefits.
I never said PDFs didn't have their uses. If I thought that, I wouldn't give a rip about the price, now would I?I love books. I like to be able to see/feel/touch them. I love the smell of books. But I can't copy information out of one and port it to another document easily. Searching for specifics term is slow, especially if said term isn't in the TOC or Index. Even moreso if you're not sure which term a book is in. (But those seaches are damn easy with PDFs!) And you ever try to travel with 100 gaming books in your backpack/luggage? Not the most efficient use of space.
And it occurs to me that I must have hurt your feelings, because now your just being snippy.You know, it occurs to me that we have a television upstairs, one in the bedroom, and one in the living room. We pay for cable for each. Is that a waste? Is that irresponsible? I have a variety of wedges in my golf bag. Is that a waste? Is that irresponsible? Last night we went to a Quote-a-Long showing of the Princess Bridge, despite the fact I've seen it dozens of times, and own the DVD. A waste? Irresponsible?
Utility comes in a variety of forms. Too bad so many folks seem to be of the opinion that their definition can be the only one, and decide
because the irony is the best thing you've posted all day.- not to mention the folks that simply MUST BE RIGHT AT ALL COSTS - just blows my mind.
I understand where people are coming from. When one sees a physical book on sale for $21.99 it only seems logical that the PDF should cost at most $21.99. IMO that is a oversimplification of the issue but it is all many of you have to go on without better industry insight or insider information.
Ultimately, you as a consumer will prove me right or wrong.
No they are the same files as the books in print now.
Have the PDF's been updated with the errata as it currently stands now?
Scott, I must say, this is a point where I feel you have really dropped the ball. A pdf can usually be updated quickly and easily. I know this because it is what I used to do for part of my last job. As long as the fixes are minor and do not cause changes in page breaks and the like, I can't see why WotC does not make the errata changes in the pdf before selling it. If the pdf is updated in the near future, will those buying it now be able to download the corrected version, or will they have to buy a new one? With a print copy the errata is not as big a deal, as they can be hand written into the book. Not so with the pdfs.No they are the same files as the books in print now.