Critical Role to Use D&D 2024 Rules For Campaign Four, Expands to Three Tables and Thirteen Players

The new campaign kicks off in October.
1755798535831.png


Critical Role will continue to use Dungeons & Dragons as the play system for its upcoming campaign, with the cast expanding to three distinct tables consisting of a total of 13 players. Today, Critical Role announced new details about its new campaign, which is set to air on October 4th. The new campaign will feature the full founding cast members as players, alongside several new players. In total, the cast includes Laura Bailey, Luis Carazo, Robbie Daymond, Aabria Iyengar, Taliesin Jaffe, Ashley Johnson, Matthew Mercer, Whitney Moore, Liam O’Brien, Marisha Ray, Sam Riegel, Alexander Ward, and Travis Willingham, with the previously announced Brennan Lee Mulligan serving as GM.

The campaign itself will be run as a "West Marches" style of campaign, with three separate groups of players exploring the world. The groups are divided into gameplay styles, with a combat-focused Soldiers group, a lore/exploration-focused Seekers group, and a intrigue-focused Schemers group. All three groups will explore the world of Araman, created by Mulligan for the campaign.

Perhaps most importantly, Critical Role will not be switching to Daggerheart for the fourth campaign. Instead, they'll be opting for the new 2024 ruleset of Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition. Daggerheart will be represented at Critical Role via the Age of Umbra and "other" Actual Play series, as well as partnerships with other Actual Play troupes.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Christian Hoffer

Christian Hoffer


log in or register to remove this ad


it is really hard to stay supportive when the people who get paid for the product aren't even using it.
How? Isn't the game fun? Who said they arent using it? Age of Umbra's still a thing and it will be ongoing.

Why does it matter if they play it or not as long as it gets support and the game is good and fun?

This is the part I really don't get. It gets a bit parasocial, to my eyes. Like I'd stop playing D&D 5e 'cause Mike Mearls doesn't seem to be playing it anymore...
 





Ummm... did Hasbro deliver a bunch of money?

I thought the whole Daggerheart thing was because Hasbro wouldn't pay them.

If they don't even support their own system, what was the point of it? I mean the campaign was originally in Pathfinder (Percy was a Gunslinger). They dropped that for endorsement money, but that's a bit different than dropping your own product.
WotC didn't give them a dime to switch from Pathfinder.
 


WotC didn't give them a dime to switch from Pathfinder.
Yep. Watching the earliest episodes, it's pretty clear they weren't bringing in endorsement money! It's definitely come a long way from Matt's hand drawn maps on large sheets of paper with too thin of a sharpie to show up well on an internet stream.

I haven't watch any CR for a couple years or more, but I'm pretty excited about this new campaign! Catering to specific play styles with different tables and exploring an entirely new setting looks pretty cool to me!
 

Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top