cry havoc or fields of blood


log in or register to remove this ad


Well Fields of Blood focuses much more on HUGE battles. The smallest unit size is 100 soldiers. Consequently, individual PCs tend to be relegated to the role of commander (although there are some rules for having PCs fight on the battlefield). It also includes a lot of information about ruling kingdoms and resource management, so if that's your thing FoB might be a good pick.

Cry Havoc focuses on a much smaller scale. Battles are restricted to several hundred individuals at most. (However, there is a "quick resolution" system for larger battles.) However, PCs can play a much more prominent role on the battlefield in the Cry Havoc system; single PCs can influence and turn the tide of battles.
 
Last edited:

I just got Fields O' Blood yesterday, and already I think it rules. It kicks @$$. Eden studios put out some errata on it already, which can be found on their website, but it really isn't much compared to the amount of material that is packed into this ~175 page book.
Just leafing through it, I am impressed with the PCs being rulers, how magic is integrated into mass combat, and seige weapons. The system is easy, and from what I read it can be broken down to smaller units if needed, or just keep them as a few large swarms that can be used for quicker-run battles. There are rules for laying seige, figuring out fortifications and time/money required to build them for a PC kingdom. This is pretty much what I have been waiting for, as players get bored with saving someone else's kingdom; they become much for enthusiastic when it's their own they have to worry about. That and quelling riots, taxing fairly, dealing with disloyal barons, war, spies, bribing dragons to stay away... nearly everything.
The book has a chapter committed to transitioning the PCs into rules instead of just saying "the king died, and left you his throne". There are a few feats and a number of PrCs, both of which are dedicated to large scale war, but that is not the focus of this book. If you want more PrCs, feats, classes and such, go get Complete Warrior. If you want kingdoms designed for the PCs to run them or against them, or want to have the PCs in charge of a large army, this is THE book.
I was waiting for the longest time for the book to come out, I thought my expectations might be too high, but then it covers everything I thought it would and more. Though Cry Havoc is...s'ok, I would buy this book first.
And no, I don't work for Eden Studios, nor did I play test it, nor did I get a free copy. I just like the book, and will read it cover to cover. Maybe even twice.
 
Last edited:

If you want a miniatures system that can handle more than 120 combatants a side, don't get Cry Havoc. I'm not too fond of it for smaller battles either.

Cry Havoc does have an abstract system, but you're looking at about 10% of the book for that - 80% of the book is dedicated to the miniatures system which isn't very good.

Why does a unit of 50 men take up a square 250' x 250' in Cry Havoc? I don't know, and I don't want to find out.

Cheers!
 

I own both, and prefer Fields of Blood. Kingdom management with battles thrown in is my focus, so FoB is the obvious choice.

Like already said, FoB is for larger armies, Havoc is for smaller ones.
 

Phaedrus said:
Like already said, FoB is for larger armies, Havoc is for smaller ones.

There is no way that Havoc should have called itself "The Essential d20 Guide to War" or as offering "definitive d20 System rules for mass combat".

Cheers!
 

Remove ads

Top