arnwyn said:Originally posted by hong
In MY experience, the FREQUENCY with which statements are made in ALL CAPS for the purpose of EMPHASIS tends to be INVERSELY related to the VERACITY or GENERALIZABILITY of said STATEMENTS.![]()

arnwyn said:Originally posted by hong
In MY experience, the FREQUENCY with which statements are made in ALL CAPS for the purpose of EMPHASIS tends to be INVERSELY related to the VERACITY or GENERALIZABILITY of said STATEMENTS.![]()
Once upon a time in a far away land, there was a theory that a popular game was probably a good game...but then the lawful evil capitalist wizards at WotC handwaved it all away with the magic words, "network externalities".Tell me again why I should give a damn about market dominance.
My my, hit a nerve, did I?*wanger spam snippage*
It must be so terrible to have so little an imagination.
rounser said:
Once upon a time in a far away land, there was a theory that a popular game was probably a good game...but then the lawful evil capitalist wizards at WotC handwaved it all away with the magic words, "network externalities".
My my, hit a nerve, did I?
I'll select (2) then, because they were out to justify something they'd already concluded - that D&D's position of market dominance had little to do with it being a good game.Pick one of the following:
1. This might actually be an intelligent remark if I were a capitalist wizard at WotC.
2. You say this like it's a negative thing.
3. Go back to your dual-wielding elf bladesingers, MONKEYBOY!
You can eat Meow Chow if you want.You can think that if you want.
rounser said:
I'll select (2) then, because they were out to justify something they'd already concluded.
- that D&D's position of market dominance had little to do with it being a good game.
You can eat Meow Chow if you want.
Aight, I'll admit it - it appeared to me that you were implying that market dominance meant nothing to a games' worth. Admittedly, perhaps not to you, so you've got me there, but speaking generally...Who's "they", homeboy? Because as far as I'm aware, none of MY clones have ever carped on about rules being the death of imagination. Now TOM CASHEL'S clones, on the other hand, you may want to speak with.
Play the ball, not the player, Steve Jackson.Dammit, the MIND CONTROL LASERS are not working on this "rounser", if that is his REAL cover. He obviously changes his tinfoil hat at the regularly prescribed intervals.
If you're on my case getting whimsical and gimmicky, I can't respond in kind? You deserve the mud you fling...better check that ego while you're at it.You have the words, but not the music.
rounser said:
Aight, I'll admit it - it appeared to me that you were implying that market dominance meant nothing to a games' worth. Admittedly, perhaps not to you, so you've got me there, but speaking generally...
Play the ball, not the player, Steve Jackson.
If you're on my case getting whimsical and gimmicky, I can't respond in kind?
You deserve the mud you fling...
better check that ego while you're at it.
Nah...I prefer the Ruin Explorer Method (TM).If you want to fling mud, fling it, rather than SAYING you're going to fling it.
rounser said:better check that ego while you're at it.
rounser said:
There might even be a connection between "lack of market dominance" and "too much bookkeeping", perish the thought...I mean, do Vampire, Rifts and (older versions of) D&D have much bookkeeping?
Nope. Because too much bookkeeping sucks.