D&D Celebrity Satine Phoenix & Husband Jamison Stone Accused Of Abuse Towards Freelancers

Not open for further replies.
D&D influencer Satine Phoenix, and her husband Jamison Stone, who run tabletop gaming company Apotheosis Studios, have been accused of abusive behavior towards freelancers and contracted workers.

Satine Phoenix is a well-known D&D personality and creator, and was the D&D Community Manager for about a year back in 2018. Both she and Stone have appeared in many events and streaming shows, and have worked with WotC, Geek & Sundry, and other companies. Recently their Kickstarter campaign Sirens: Battle of the Bards raised over $300,000. At GaryCon, a US gaming convention, the couple held a public wedding.


Accusations were initially leveled last week against Stone by tattooist Chad Rowe, who tweeted about the abusive way in which Stone, as his client at the time, treated him. The artist was "insulted, berated, and talked down to as if I was a lesser person". Other reports started to roll in as people shared similar experiences, with people revealing how they had been bullied by them, and how the pair frequently portrayed themselves as 'better' than those they worked with. At the time of writing there have been many such reports including one from voice actress and designer Liisa Lee who was subjected to underhanded business practices by Phoenix and her then partner Ruty Rutenberg. Others indicated difficulties in getting paid for work done for Stone and Phoenix or their company.

Lysa Penrose reported on problematic interactions while Phoenix worked at WotC, who was the primary point of contact regarding a report of abuse. Penrose reports that Phoenix failed to pass on the reports of abuse, and continued to publicly associate with the abuser.

Jamison Stone has since resigned as CEO of Apotheosis Studios (though the pair do own the company) and issued a long apology which has been widely criticized. Phoenix released a statement about a week later. Screenshots leaked from a private channel indicate that they have adopted a strategy of shifting the blame onto Stone, so that Phoenix's public image remain intact, with Stone writing “I also am ensuring behind the scenes ... we shield Satine as much as physically possible from damage.”

D&D In A Castle, which is an event which hosts D&D games run by professional DMs in a weekend break in a castle, has dropped the pair from its lineup, as has Jasper's Game Day, an organization which works to prevent suicides. Origins Game Fair, at which the couple are celebrity guests, removed Stone from its guest list, but not Phoenix, stating that "staff assessed that there was no immediate risk of physical harm".

According to ComicBook.com. former collaborator of Phoenix, Ruty Rutenberg, is suing Phoenix, alleging misappropriation of $40,000 of stream network Maze Arcana's money.

log in or register to remove this ad

log in or register to remove this ad

He's a misogynist who thinks men should be in charge and have all the workplace leadership jobs, women should be home in the kitchen, and thinks only skinny women can be attractive. I happen to think that's a horrible person. Obviously, your opinion may vary...
I'm not going to get into it here as we'd likely derail the thread and receive unwelcoming visitations from the mods. ;)


She's more famous than them, so I imagine pretty good. Narcissists are extremely polite and charming to those who they think they can gain something from. The minute a person's usefulness is done, however, it's like night and day.


You don't judge someone by how they treat peers, bosses/superiors and those able to advance their interests. You judge someone by how they treat employees, contractors service people etc. Much more likely to give a true view of who they actually are.


Right? How do we have “celebrity players”? I get someone like Vin Diesel, a celebrity who plays D&D but someone who is a celebrity because they play D&D and peacock up for YouTube? Cool story bro. I want to support Indy creators and all but treating gamers like rock stars?
Vin Diesel is a celebrity for being well known to many people and the huge parasocial relationship effects.

People playing games and sharing it can get the same parasocial effects. Hence become celebrities, if only in a niche.

Parasocial connections -- when you feel you know someone via one-way social interactions, like movies or videos or music or gossip magazines or political talk shows -- creates most of the celebrities of the modern era.

People get attached to the presented character (be it a formal character or a type of character, or whatever the person presents) and that attachment from many people has value in promoting other works.

LMM is a celebrity, in that when I hear he's done music for something, it makes me more likely to want to experience it. And the persona he's sharing (real or not) amuses me to watch. I get that that isn't him, and the connection I feel isn't reciprocal.

There are small-time podcasters I listen to. Not a huge audience. But if I ran into them, I'd love to buy them a drink. Heck, if I ran into one of them and they asked me to spot them a 20, I'd do it and write it off as a loss if I never got it back. They don't know me from adam. Take that benefit, and multiply it by millions, and that is social and economic power.

And some of them just play D&D on some obscure podcast you have never heard of. They don't have millions of followers, so their celebrity power is limited. As the audience grows, the amount of parasocial connections they have scales linearly.


Doing the best imitation of myself
I wish I could say any of this is surprising, but ... it's just not. I'm an old fart, and I've also been lucky enough to be around a lot of people in the industry from the past few decades. It's also present in every part of fandom. Talk to me about the scene at science fiction fandom conventions sometimes ... ugh. This isn't something new.

I think the most important thing is to be very selective as far as who is your brand ambassador.


I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you on this perception of Satine and I have not read the entire thread, but from the first page - I get the idea she certainly is an enabler of abusive and manipulative people, but from the little I have seen its mostly that Jamison dude who is the monster. She is certainly complicit in that she should have reined him in, and that could be seen as manipulative, in that she sets her attack dog on the innocents, but one could also see it that she didn't want to engage or confront Jamison on his handling of the issues. Could she be afraid or intimidated by him?

Am I far out in this? Is there something that I'm possibly missing?

EDIT: Yup I was missing the Liisa story. Ignore the above.
I will post it in the OP so people don’t miss it. I should probably add Jamison‘s PR response where it came out that he’s going to try and take the brunt of the backlash and try to protect Satine’s image.

Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Latest threads

Remove ads


Remove ads

Upcoming Releases