I would consider any score 65% or higher to be "significant".reposting my results from the original thread.
View attachment 359554
I answered the questions as truthfully as I could. I'm highly intellegent, poorly social, a bit of an outcast, highly independent, and strongly value knowledge. I was expecting to be like 110% wizard, but nope. I'm apparently full Paladin. Nailing Paladin that hard at first confused me, but then I remembered that 5th Paladins didn't have to be divinely focused. A freedom fighter type Paladin actually would describe my perfect self pretty well. Highly motivated by my own moral compass, trying to help those that I saw as being taken advantage of, perfectly comfortable working on the fringes of society.
Edit:
I was pretty surprised by how accurate the results were. Paladin caught me a little off guard, but made sense in retrospect. The others I probably would have given the same % if I just set them myself, except cleric. Cleric should be something like 20%.
I would read this as Barbarian-Fighter 70% with a generalist approach that likes stealth (Rogue, Ranger 60%) and dabbles in magic (Druid, Wizard, Paladin 60%)?
I wonder if being a forever-DM can also be understood as a kind of class? If so, lots of combat encounters, including stealth and a dash magic?Not really, I had no assumptions so I couldn't really be surprised. I am a forever DM and have never really thought of what class fits me. I guess the variety speaks to that. I also answered very few as 100% agree or disagree
Champion of justice 100% and intellectual 75%, art and nature 65%? At least to me that tracks.
That just means that you'd be happy to play everything equally well, and don't have a strong preference for any one particular class.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.