No, I already explained what I want. Several times, in fact. Descriptions of racial tendencies using primarily neutral terminology or outright showing how both the good and evil aspects of the tendency are expressed. For instance, how the monsters in the
Level Up Monstrous Menagerie are being written, where alignment--on those rare occasions it is used, and then only with supernatural entities--is nothing more than a tag used for mechanical purposes (as in, spells or items that affect only Lawful creatures).
For instance, here is a bit from the most recent monster previewed, the yeti:
View attachment 144380
This is what I want. Yeti that,
by RAW, can be gentle or cruel, dangerous or helpful, that can be pacified or even befriended with food or act as implacable enemies that attack for no obvious reason
without me having to erase the entire description and reimagine their entire sociology like I have to do in base D&D. (Seriously. If I want 5e orcs to be neutral, I literally have to rewrite every single bit of text they have in the MM and in Volos. I'd have to rewrite about half their text if I wanted them to be
Lawful or
Neutral evil.)
Maybe you'll hate the yeti entry, or all the other entries listed in the thread I linked. I dunno. Maybe you'll like them. Give 'em a read and find out.