Kae'Yoss
First Post
Patryn of Elvenshae said:I didn't see any posts of "moral outrage" when the initial post went up. It's hypocrtical to complain now.
Bah, moral. I traded that in for experience points.
Shadowdancer said:Yes, I'm a reporter. I don't see why the media is being blamed for this. The statement was made by a prosecutor, a public official. Even if it is a completely idiotic statement, it's fair game to use it in the story.
I'd think that quoting idiots - without making fun of them - would be a bad Idea. It implies that the writer agrees or at least has no problem with it.
So if some guy says that he thinks D&D might be involved because the victim was stabbed, he makes a fool of himself. If someone else reports that, without commenting on it, like "This statement is not the most professional, since knives are rather commonplace in our society and used often in crimes", it seems the reporter doesn't have a problem with the statement, and makes a fool of himself, too.
Blame the general public who wants to read sensationalistic drek like that -- that's the reason the news media uses quotes like that, because it sells newspapers and increases ratings.
They're not selling newspapers, they're selling their morality. Just because people want things, it isn't OK to provide.
I'm sure there is a big demand for drugs in the area, but that doesn't mean I'm blameless when I start dealing drugs.
Of course, the reporter should have had the intelligence to question the DA further to see what basis he has for making this statement. Then include that information in the story, to show what an idiot the DA is. People have a right to know if their public officials are idiots. Hmmm, maybe that's what the reporter WAS doing in this case, letting people know how stupid this DA is if he thinks the killing spree was connected to a game.
As I said above. When they just print without comment, it's no wonder they get part of the blame. Sometimes we should shoot the messenger.