Desdichado
Hero
Alright, I'll try and reword them. I still think the context of what I typically enjoy helps the review make more sense for readers, but obviously you weren't the only one confused.
D20 Review Section Reputation
icebreaker
First Post
I really don't see the problem if you and 20 people feel RoTToEE is the greatest module ever..whats wrong with them posting that?
Unless the criteria changes on how a review may be judged being a fan of a product shouldn't make you exempt from posting your review.
There is a big difference between wanting all the people that think a product is a 5 to post..and wanting people to post 5's so the product you like rates better.. the first is acceptable the second isn't.
Unless the criteria changes on how a review may be judged being a fan of a product shouldn't make you exempt from posting your review.
There is a big difference between wanting all the people that think a product is a 5 to post..and wanting people to post 5's so the product you like rates better.. the first is acceptable the second isn't.
Furn_Darkside
First Post
Nightfall said:
I say we take off nightfall's reviews.
They are often long- and the nap breaks I need to take to finish them are really taking a good chunk of time from my life.
Besides- he has a weird look in his eye...
FD
Furn_Darkside
First Post
icebreaker said:
I am all for it- I think the more opinions the better.
I just did not care for the review in question. I have never run, played, or even read RtToEE- and that review gave me little insight why I would want to do any of those or avoid doing any of those.
But.. then.. I usually use reviews after my purchases to see if I missed something in my reading. So, I am not probably not a good judge on the usefulness of reviews for the sake of purchases.
FD
the Jester
Legend
Well, I'd give RttToEE a 5 if I were to review it.
If I were reviewing stuff, which I haven't yet, though I have been considering it, I'd try to start with stuff I've run imc. I don't think you gave it a fair shake, Doc; no offense, but without having tried running the adventure and seeing how well it all runs together, I don't know how "objective" your review can be.
If I were reviewing stuff, which I haven't yet, though I have been considering it, I'd try to start with stuff I've run imc. I don't think you gave it a fair shake, Doc; no offense, but without having tried running the adventure and seeing how well it all runs together, I don't know how "objective" your review can be.
