Said difference is somewhat tenuous at times. You can, for example, be born with superpowers inherited from your parents, and not be considered a mutant. You can carry the mutant gene and be considered to be a normal human. You can acquire mutant-derived powers from experimentation or Mutant Growth Hormone.Major nerd points for recognizing the difference between “mutant” and “mutate” in the Marvel mythos!
But we know how our senses work and that touch has nothing to do with light reception. Colors very much so. Yes I believe he can feel every single stroke - but that says nothing about the imagery of the painting. You can check it for yourself, go to a museum, go close to an oil painting - the strokes are often in completely different directions than the colors that form the shapes that you see as the imagery.The context neither you nor I have here is knowing what information a sense of touch that sensitive gives you. We can guess... but we don't know
But we know how our senses work and that touch has nothing to do with light reception. Colors very much so. Yes I believe he can feel every single stroke - but that says nothing about the imagery of the painting. You can check it for yourself, go to a museum, go close to an oil painting - the strokes are often in completely different directions than the colors that form the shapes that you see as the imagery.
If his touch somehow can feel light and light reflections through superhuman touch, he might be able to "see" the painting. But he would also have a lot of physical trouble walking outside.
Hm, yeah, this could be an apporach, but they are all dissolved in oil or acryl, I don't know how much of the pigments are even touchable from the outside or if they all are visible through a layer of oil he can't reach through. But even if, I just can't imagine someone appreciating a painting while feeling small excerpts (he can't touch the whole painting at once like we can see it at once) of slightly different textures of smaller than sand particles. Over and all too many hoops to be plausible even with superhuman sense of touch.Don't different pigments have different physical composition, grain size, density, etc.? Maybe that's what he's picking up. He won't likely be able to sense that the "red" used in the painting is the same color as his costume, but he'll be able to reconstruct some color information on top of what he can get from the strokes. Similar to us seeing false color images.
It's literally not possible with thick oil paints like that. You can't obtain information that doesn't exist. That's the problem here. It's not that information is "hard to discover", it's that via that vector of investigation (touching but not disrupting/damaging), that information simply doesn't exist.I mean, I understand what you're saying about the texture of the painting and how unlikely it seems that would convey the level of information that Daredevil received from running his fingers across the painting. To us, that info would be meaningless, especially with the roadblocks you mentioned. To him... who knows.
Yes. The other examples are actual physically possible within the logic of the show. This isn't. You don't seem to be understanding what I'm saying about paint (but I'm not sure). Literally everyone else seems to, so I'm not going to argue it further, but this isn't like disabling or killing someone by chucking a tooth into their eye when you have special throwing and precision powers, it's like doing that but with a tiny amount of candy floss or shooting them ultra-precisely with a normal (not supersoaker etc.) old-fashion squirtgun loaded with water and them instantly and messily dying or something. It's too stupid by the show's own logic. I get that it's repeating something from the comics, but as I said, that needs to be used with care.And this is a bridge too far?
I just chalk this one up to bad writing, almost certainly from the fired showrunner.I just chalk it up to Matt's training with Stick.
Excuse my bluntness, but that makes zero sense. There's no such as a single brushstroke that will simultaneously paint say, part of a rose and also the vase behind it.But we know how our senses work and that touch has nothing to do with light reception. Colors very much so. Yes I believe he can feel every single stroke - but that says nothing about the imagery of the painting. You can check it for yourself, go to a museum, go close to an oil painting - the strokes are often in completely different directions than the colors that form the shapes that you see as the imagery.
That's not what he's saying, and he's correct in what he's saying. I suggest re-reading what he actually typed.Excuse my bluntness, but that makes zero sense. There's no such as a single brushstroke that will simultaneously paint say, part of a rose and also the vase behind it.
It is something that instantly jarred me out of the story to go "what?" when it happened whereas focusing in on specific distant sounds and not being devastated by loud gunshots near his super hearing did not. Thus my bringing it up.And this is a bridge too far?
That's going to vary by user, and our need to adjust our suspenders is going to differ per consumer. For example, anything computer related I have to adjust my suspenders very tightly because all of it is just... wrong. And there wouldn't need to be many changes to make it better. But I get why they wouldn't do it for the %age of people that will take umbrage. And in relation to all the other fantastical things going on... I get it. I think this is the same, especially as we're dealing with superhuman sense that (a) don't exist and (b) we have no way to model.It is something that instantly jarred me out of the story to go "what?" when it happened whereas focusing in on specific distant sounds and not being devastated by loud gunshots near his super hearing did not. Thus my bringing it up.![]()

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.