TSR Darlene tells NuTSR NO!

The artist Darlene, who designed one of the original TSR logos that TSR3.5 is currently using...

The artist Darlene, who designed one of the original TSR logos that TSR3.5 is currently using, has emphatically and publicly refused to endorse the company's use of the logo.

Darlene's work appeared in early Dungeons & Dragons materials, and included the full-color map in 1980's World of Greyhawk.

17AEE64F-2E34-4876-9FBB-FB37032C296D.jpeg


In December, I finally reviewed the contract Justin LaNasa (JL) wanted me to sign. That’s when I took a stand and gave this answer: “I prefer not to be directly involved in any way with your lawsuit against WOTC. Therefore, I do not give permission to use the Wizard-head logo."

For the longest time, I tried to remain neutral, aloof, and unaffected. I wanted to avoid being associated with the bombastic claims of the new TSR.

JL first responded with a denial: “We were not planning on having you in the lawsuit this is why we ask for your permission.” Then a guilt trip: “We really tried to bring back something good with TSR.” Then played the underdog card: “it seems like WOTC and their supporters have a lot of fear and sway amongst the industry.”

It’s upsetting if JL thought I would be stupid enough to sign a contract without reading or comprehending it. In my response, I referred him to item #3 which obligates me to defend his position in his WOTC lawsuit. 


The pressure they are putting on me to reconsider has increased. Ernie Gygax thinks granting my permission for them to use the logo—which, btw, they are already using anyway—is key for their successful arbitration. He intimated if I don’t give in, sign away my rights and take their money, I’d be hurting some people I really care about. He also suggested I can “up the ante” for double the amount initially offered.

JL has since amicably proposed to work out a contract that excludes me from the lawsuit. He’s been very nice and cordial to me throughout. Nevertheless... The contract will most likely retain the first sentence where I declare that I have “not previously transferred my rights to any entity or party.” What? As I understand it, logos don’t work that way.

The most important thing to me has not been addressed. As a visual thinker and logo designer, I am very particular about the nuances of what I create. Yes, I designed the original wizard-head logo back in the ’80s. That is not in dispute. However, the logo produced as “Exhibit ‘A’” in JL’s contract is not my logo. It’s a bastardization—a greyed-out, fuzzy, lesser version—of what I designed. I detest the spindly letters used for "The Game Wizards." Ugh!

Therefore, I cannot honestly take money for it because I do not and will not claim it as mine. I’m extremely picky about choosing my clients. Before I would consider designing a new logo for the new TSR, they would have to demonstrate ethical behavior as a business entity.

Ever since they appeared on the scene, the new TSR has been plucking the heartstrings of those who fondly remember the good ole days when the hobby was in its infancy. JL’s lofty words: “to honor and remember TSR, the Dragon, Gary and all the alumni of the old days of gaming” sound inspiring. But I remain unmoved. I never want to return to Lake Geneva to relive those “good old days."


If I were to endorse the new TSR, they have to correct the mistakes of the old TSR. They must be kinder and more generous to artists and authors in their employ. They would show proper respect, listen to, and honor women, both within the gaming field and as consumers. They would be more inclusive and sensitive enough to address the needs of individuals beyond the white male demographic. They would be fair to their customers and transparent in their actions.


Besides, the idea of me endorsing TSR—new or old—is laughable. Not always, but in general, I did not have a positive experience freelancing for TSR. Looking from the outside in, I witnessed how the growth spurts of TSR turned it from being an “all-for-one; one-for-all” company into an uncaring corporate entity with an “us vs them” mindset. With few exceptions, success brought out the worst in those TSR people given positions of authority. I witnessed how the creatives got the brunt of TSR’s unfair predatory policies. No, I do not yearn to return to that stressful, hostile, and toxic atmosphere.


My memories of TSR are clear because they are frozen to the time I needed to leave Lake Geneva for my own mental health and well-being. I turned my back on the growing number of small-minded TSR people who created and spread malicious rumors and hurtful lies about me, made me feel unwelcome whenever I visited the building, told me my art was not very good and caused me to doubt myself and my abilities.

I left to pursue knowledge, my MFA, and the prospect of new beginnings with no intention of returning. Gary Gygax contacted me in 2005 and coaxed me back. That’s when he and I became fast friends. In the years since, I’ve discovered—for the most part— nothing much has changed for females in the gaming world (ie: gamergate). TSR’s unfair internal practices (abusing creatives financially) seem to have followed the RPG industry. How do I know? Having worked as a professional in the “real world” since 1984, I’m aware of the many disparities.


Today, I decided to publicly share my “power of no” because I recognize this as a teachable moment for the dispossessed. Charged with 42 years of suppressed emotional pain, my “no” is big and empowered. It includes “no” to bullying and unethical business practices; “no” to the unfair treatment and compensation of artists, creatives, and women; and “no” to taking advantage of the disadvantaged to profit at their expense.


My “no” is also cathartic for me. With it, I officially reclaim those lost parts of myself I abandoned so long ago. To have the courage to take this stance, my desire for money had to be relinquished. Only then could I clearly understand the implications of what saying yes meant. As tempting as a yes would be, it is ultimately disempowering.


Compromising my integrity for money is the same as selling my soul.

Therefore, I choose to continue living like I always have, modestly. I choose not to allow temporary feelings of desperation or depression to rule me nor compromise the greater truth of who I am. Perhaps I should credit JL for catalyzing my healing process and helping me demonstrate what feminine power looks like.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

MGibster

Legend
Most clowns are not sad at all. Clowning is a seriously intensive and admirable profession, with roots in comedia del arte.
I find them depressing and have so since I was a child. They're not scary but they're not particularly funny either. They seem like an odd relic of a bygone era to me. I don't know if a clown has ever made my laugh. Krusty doesn't count.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Charlaquin

Goblin Queen (She/Her/Hers)
I find them depressing and have so since I was a child. They're not scary but they're not particularly funny either. They seem like an odd relic of a bygone era to me. I don't know if a clown has ever made my laugh. Krusty doesn't count.
Not everyone finds clowns funny, that’s perfectly fine. There isn’t a form of performance art (or… any art…) that everyone likes. But it’s a legitimate profession that people put a lot of work into learning. You might as well say you find lawyers or teachers or software engineers depressing.
 

MGibster

Legend
Not everyone finds clowns funny, that’s perfectly fine. There isn’t a form of performance art (or… any art…) that everyone likes. But it’s a legitimate profession that people put a lot of work into learning. You might as well say you find lawyers or teachers or software engineers depressing.
My apologies to any clowns or clown aficionados I might have offended with my anti-clownist remarks.
 



CleverNickName

Limit Break Dancing
I'd never really given much thought to clowns or clowning until this thread came along. I've since fallen down a couple of rabbit holes on the Internet, and I've gone from unknowing indifference to somewhat-informed respect. Clowns are pretty rad in my book now.

This is one of the best clown routines I could find on YouTube.



This one's a classic, apparently, but I just found it the other day.


It's strange, but if it weren't for the antics of TSR3 this year, I might never have discovered an appreciation for clowning (real, professional clowning...not JL's brand of "performative art.")
 
Last edited:


Dannyalcatraz

Schmoderator
Staff member
Supporter
Or settling alight the longboat while they're still traveling through the fjords.
I just had a mental image of one Viking walking along with flaming arrows in his back,

“Damn it Ulf, I’m not dead yet!”

“You’re not fooling anyone, you know!”
 

Mistwell

Crusty Old Meatwad (he/him)
Why would they do that? They've already made their case of ownership of the IP, and they don't need Darlene at all. In fact, I'd think it would weaken their position of saying they have that IP since they bought it from TSR, to have Darlene come in and say she somehow still has some sort of say over it. They don't need her to say she made the logo for TSR because that's already a given and no one is in dispute of that. This is all about if Wotc owns the IP because they let the trademark lapse, and Darlene isn't involved in that any more than the person who made the Apple logo if for some reason apple let that trademark lapse and someone else tried snatching it up.

No, this is clear. The only reason Darlene would be called into court or be brought into this mess is if Justin brings her in somehow.
My professional legal opinion is you're incorrect and WOTC may well want to depose her or send her a records request.
 


Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top