Lanefan
Victoria Rules
Interesting that 1e did not, and is my preference; though I had never noticed this (very minor) connection before now.Technically OD&D had tiers of play.
Technically 2E acknowledged high level play options.
Technically 3E had two tiers (Standard and Epic)
I'm not a fan. I don't mind a fuzzy sort-of idea of low-level play, mid-level play, and high-level play but these really don't need to be hard-cast into the system. Each group will define these things differently - 7th level may be low to one group, mid to another, and high to a third...and off the chart for an E-6er.I don't understand why anyone would 'dislike' the concept of tiers. I can understand people not liking to play certain tiers, but not liking the concept is bewildering.

They do?Incenjucar said:They have pre-1st level rules now.
Why oh why weren't these included with original core 4e?
Paragon-tier 4e is already well past low fantasy in my eyes and pretty quickly leaves Tolkein behind as well.Upper Krust said:Paralleling low fantasy/sword & sorcery, mid fantasy/tolkeinesque and high fantasy/epic archetypes.
Lan-"can anyone tell me if 4e is capable of high camp a la Hercules/Xena"-efan