Oops, that way yesterday for me, so it wasn't there when I looked today (damned time difference). Happy birthday Bront!Rystil Arden said:By the way--really quick before I miss it: Happy birthday Bront!
You said Praetors had the same aging rate, heights, and weights as humans...so that's what I was working from.Rystil Arden said:(OOC: Did I say 90 before--I would have been wrong. It should be somewhere around 125 on average for Praetors (which is where they go Venerable). Well, 90 might be right if you take into account the ones who died young in battle. Keep in mind that Venerable age's start age is about average for death for a non-PC.)
I was wrong when I said that because I'm dumb. They age the same as humans at the beginning and slow down to age a bit more slowly and then a bit more and then a bit more. High Praetors live longer than the commoners, and Archons claim that they can live for even longer still, and based on how long they seem youthful, this seems possible, although none has been around long enough to prove it.unleashed said:You said Praetors had the same aging rate, heights, and weights as humans...so that's what I was working from.
unleashed said:So, have you got any actual figues I can put in the setting document?
Low Praetor 14 32 50 72 +2d20
High Praetor 15 40 75 125 +3d20
Archon 17 100 ??? ??? +???
It's boring to guesstimate numbers though. I prefer just comparing them as > or < some other race instead. Telling me to do boring numbers charts is a bad planBront said:You should get it for all races while you're at it
that, and ht and weight charts.
I think you forgot my comment that the Venerable limit itself is the general average--some people die of natural causes before veen hitting Venerable. PCs are a step aboveunleashed said:Okay, corrected the post that was relevant to, and added it to the setting document.