(Discussion) General Part I

Status
Not open for further replies.
Also, one thing that i can immediately see is missing is a nature god, some kind of elf/druid/ranger god for the tree huggers...I mean nature lovers. If its alright, I could create/run the nature god, so that we've got the druid/ranger bunch covered. How bout it GaryH/Creamsteak/whoever's in control? Can I create a god? PLEEEAAASSSEE?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Gary, if you find the thread needs another bartender/dm to keep things going smoothly till I get back, pick a good willing guy to help out. When I get back, and I'm ready, I'll start raising things up a notch. If someone, as a DM, is ready to take some people on an adventure... then you need to email GaryH and any other judges (Uriel if he accepts, for instance) to get approval. Email me as well, I just won't be able to pick up on it right away. [/B]

I have officially 'accepted' the Judge spot.
That being said, I feel that my primary email might get a bit bogged, so let's go with one that I just created for these games yellowboy333@hotmail.com for now
for Living EnWorld games.

As well, I think that (unless we Do get to have a seperate Forum) it is important to have the tag (LEW) in the threads for the spin-off games, so as not to make it even more difficult for folks to find their games.
I do not subscribe to any threads right now, as DMing 5 active and playing in another dozen makes it a bit crazy when you see '115 new' and they are all EnWorld...
I will, of course, subscribe to the LEW threads with the new address, fear not.

As well, my schedule (I work in a Nightclub) means that I
often am up from dark till dawn, for those of you silly gits (like myself) that post a lot in the middle of the night, or in the daytime for those in Europe for example)

Guess I'll put my 2 'new ' games on a back-burner...

Now, where to place my 'Belching-Orc-Inn...'

-Uriel/Ron
 
Last edited:

Re: [Living Enworld] Read this, new game, new concept...

creamsteak said:
Monday, August 18th, 2:46 AM (central),

I was trying to sleep, but my muse hit. At Gencon I was privy to what the RPGA calls Living Greyhawk. Living Greyhawk is only 'somewhat' alive. Character interaction isn't very deep, and a lot of the things that make a campaign setting alive are non-existent. For instance, characters are not normally permitted to create their own magic items. Characters cannot develop their own spells without the approval of a bunch of groups of people called Triads, and to my knowledge it's never been done.

I want a living game. I want to be able to create a character that is an interactive part of not just my gaming tables campaign. I want to be able to create an item for someone who took the time to find me, just to make his item. I want a Living Campaign setting.

Does this idea catch your attention? Then read on... I've got a little more to say...



The world will be named Enworld. Enworld will be made up of a number of homebrew people, locations, and events constructed by those people who are willing. A group of people will act as judges, overseeing all of the characters, events, and locations as they are spawned, destroyed, and changed by the passing of time. Judges will also get to arbitrate global events and the passing of time on the setting. There will be a number of games ran inside the setting by willing DMs with willing players. Every game will operate independently, some being for just 1 player while others occupy groups of more. The characters, in turn, will be able to interact with each other on a regular basis.

The way I'm seeing this playing out...

The first game in the Out of Character forum will be a character glossery. Any number of 1st level characters made using the guidelines provided will be stored here. This, I guess, isn't too different from YB in that respect. Characters will be viewable to all of the players, dms, and judges that are are around. It will also, most likely, become a rule of thumb that players need to attach (in smallest text) a link to their individual characters in their sigs. This is so a DM can quickly access your post in a thread without any problems.

The first game In Character thread for this game will probably be a Tavern. A Tavern is a safe place where characters can interact, and form groups. There may end up being a number of these in different parts of the campaign setting. The first tavern will be the only one, until a player reaches another location and creates a tavern of his own, which will probably have a level minimum like 6. There will obviously be a limit on the total number of these, but it shouldn't be a problem if it takes some time to reach that point. One player may found the, "Red Dragon's Inn" in the city of "Made up Name" on the coast of the "Place where some adventure is to be had".

The second out of character thread would be for the first DMs to work on an interactive adventure. Something simple, with two groups that are operating seperately, but get to meet up at different points in the game. They would discuss here just like you would in any other OOC thread for a game, except that players would probably be discouraged from reading certain parts. Actual module writing might need to be handled elsewhere, or even through email, if it gets to that.

The second in character thread would be the FIRST ADVENTURE! The place where it all starts. Like any other PbP.

After an adventure, characters that survive would be able to spend their money and buy their items for their next adventure. Interact with characters, provide some help for lower level characters, and maybe even start building in the world (construct a settlement, tavern, blacksmith, etc.) Of course, players with multiple characters would have to be restricted from 'feeding' their own lower level characters, but I expect the people around this forum to be honest.

So, what do you think? Think it would work? Want to do it?

This shares many features with The 13 Kingdoms! Very exciting! (T13K is not set up for PbP though.)

I'd be interested in this, all around.
 

actually, with the first IC thread getting a tidal wave of posts, I'll wait for, and if, another inn/tavern/stronghold/temple is established, and add to that creative thrust.

And I'd vote for a totally organic, community-created world - noone should have to be a "DM" to make a NPC, or Inn, or something. Just run it by some committee, or someone in a higher 'role', and bingo - place it on the map.

The map should be big enough to handle the creative juices of the entire community, no? ;)
 

Uriel_fire_of_Heaven said:
Submitted a deity in my last post via edit...thoughts CS,GaryH?

Looks good, but I'd prefer it if you removed the references to Garl et al. from Greyhawk/standard D&D. We're going to have a pantheon totally from scratch, and not import any of the Greyhawk/FR/etc. gods.
 

reapersaurus said:
actually, with the first IC thread getting a tidal wave of posts, I'll wait for, and if, another inn/tavern/stronghold/temple is established, and add to that creative thrust.

Hmm... cs said that the Red Dragon would be the only tavern around, until a PC eventually found some other place to start one. I don't know if he plans on changing that, though, as having all those characters in the Red Dragon could be *slightly* problematic.

And I'd vote for a totally organic, community-created world - noone should have to be a "DM" to make a NPC, or Inn, or something. Just run it by some committee, or someone in a higher 'role', and bingo - place it on the map.

That's more of a cs thing, so I won't say anything.

The map should be big enough to handle the creative juices of the entire community, no? ;)

If it's not, then we'll make it bigger. :)
 

garyh said:


Looks good, but I'd prefer it if you removed the references to Garl et al. from Greyhawk/standard D&D. We're going to have a pantheon totally from scratch, and not import any of the Greyhawk/FR/etc. gods.

Edited.
 




Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top