• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

(Discussion) General Part VI

Status
Not open for further replies.
Uriel said:
Yes the DMG has rules for oversized weapons. As per the PH, you incur a -2 to hit using an oversized weapon without the feat, not a -4.
As well, you don't have the correct damage mod from strength, which would be x1.5.
You have +5/6 Raging listed for Str bonus, when you should have +7/9 raging.
Just trying to help.

-Uriel

In addition to the penalty to hit, increasing the size category makes the weapon harder to use too. A light weapon becomes one-handed, a one-handed weapon becomes two-handed, and a two-handed weapon becomes unusable. This penalty is what monkey grip removes, and is also why you never see people with oversized weapons. It makes them useless.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Creamsteak said:
Alright, I'll keep that in mind. Just watch the Red Dragon Inn, as I'll be having an adventure start there soon.



Alright, if I could direct everyone's attention to my new sticky thread organization. Please look at the Guide thread, and tell me what to add (preferably by stating exactly what you would say, so that we can examine that and copy and paste it into the thread if it's good). Then, once we've shaped that thread, I'm going to start the reconstruction of some of the basic top-level mechanics of LEW, but that has to come second to the construction of this guide thread.

The other thing which I think you need is lists of LEW specific rules. Or possibly just links to threads that contain the lists. I can't type it up because I don't actually know what they are, but the ones I can think of that you'd need are races, PrCs, feats, spells, domains, and gods. It looks like the judging related stuff is basically decided at your discretion, so that should probably stay out.
 

DM-Rocco said:
nimisogd, I sent you two emails now at nimisgod@hotmail.com , if that is not the correct address then please just say so. I am not trying to be difficult or anything. You can e-mail me if you choose, CEROCCO@AOL.COM , yes, I have an AOL account, I know it sucks, but I am to lazy to change it.

K. Will wait for one day before emailing you myself. Hotmail has these slow spots sometimes. Or maybe my account just hates you, for some reason. Or it hates your characters. Either way, I'll email you within a day or so...

And I think you should be a bard or a psion (telepath), if you want to be a charismatic puppet master. Wizard is just as good if you want to be a puppet master who relies only on Int and Magic instead of charisma and natural charm.
 

Creamsteak said:
I'm unsure of dpdx and Manzita, as they've been absent for a bit, but the current LEW judges that are present are myself, nimisgod, pbartender, and Uriel, and perhaps Knight Otu. I sincerely hope I'm not forgetting anyone, but it has been a bit since I've been active (6 weeks I think).
As I said earlier, I'm willing to lend my hand as a judge. If you need to send me something via e-mail, it is
olifran
at
gmx.de

I don't think there is currently any way to show my e-mail in my profile as long as all mail-related functions are turned off.

dpdx I think posted earlier in this thread that he will likely be unavailable some time... here it is:

dpdx said:
Availability dicey until next week or so.
I'll be moving house this week, and will have any kind of consistent net access shut down for quite awhile after, even. I will try to check this board regularly, but I can't guarantee that I will, so if any of the games I judge have need of me, email is best, and my profile email is up to date.
 

Roleplaying-wise, I'm a little bit busy working on my a new world for my gaming group's next campaign, but I plan on renewing my efforts toward a LEW web-site.

I will start with the Approved Gods, A handful of PrCs that I am certain are Approved, and whatever newbie-FAQ-type info I can find.

If anyone wants to make avbsolute certain that something is included on the website, email it to me at: MWDomeier(at)hotmail(dot)com. It the title of the email, please include "LEW" and be explicit about what the email contains for submission. Normally, a link to the post or thread that contains the relevant information should be enough, but if you plan on including attached files (especially large ones), it's best to warn me ahead of time.
 
Last edited:


Steve Jung said:
If I remember correctly, Kahuna Burger has a gnome (?) cleric without a deity. The character is a member of the Mortalists, an atheist group. Check in the character thread.

Yes, Kirin "I'm here to help". :p can't seem to find my write up of the mortalists, think its buried in a discussion thread or two. (no search) Basicly they could be seen as the secular humanists of the fantasy world. Some definitly do not believe in the gods while others merely think they are irrelevant to the progression and success/happiness of the mortal races. They're into positive action to improve the lot of the world (its all we have and we're the only ones going to make things better) and generally against prejudice (are we not all mortals and equally to be valued in our sentience?). common domains are knowlege, magic, healing, protection, occasionally strength or even war in a more strife filled area. Prostelitizing or actively anti god/religious Mortalists are rare, though more common amoung clerics who had formerly served another church.

I recal another character proposed a less friendly godless philosophy, possibly closer to Objectivism than Humanism, but I don't recal many details, just that general impression, and I don't know if they had clerics.

Kahuna Burger
 

Thomas Hobbes said:
Vet: To subject to thorough examination or evaluation. One vets a manuscript.

Linguistically related to "vetrinarians", I think.

In context it generally also implies an approval or screening process. "All manuscripts have to be vetted by the publisher's copyright pool before they are considered for publication."

but vocab aside, I'll rephrase : Have there been any adventures rejected or altered due to the "approval by a judge" phase, and is it worth the extra beurocratic step between encouraging folks to DM and letting them? I know that the idea was intimidating and a bit off putting when I first considered running a game, and even when things were moving more smoothly I tended to give up and post the Inn announcement and hope approval caught up by the time I wanted to award anyone XP. ;) If we had plently of judges with lots of time on their hands and lots of DMs clamoring for a chance to run their adventure here, I could see it, but maybe during this drought we should be more relaxed about it...

Oh yeah, I'm running a vingette called "the old fashioned way" to help stave off a red Dragon riot :p , does anyone want to judge it? :o

Kahuna Burger
 

Living ENWorld Judge said:
Once a character is approved, your character can go to the Red Dragon Inn.
Is this change to prevent un-approved characters going on adventure?

And I guess I really should start a (Proposal) thread on Sairundan.
 

Kahuna Burger said:
I recal another character proposed a less friendly godless philosophy, possibly closer to Objectivism than Humanism, but I don't recal many details, just that general impression, and I don't know if they had clerics.

Kahuna Burger

I believe they were called the Amoralists or some such.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top