• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

(Discussion) General Part VI

Status
Not open for further replies.
WizWrm said:
Have you gotten a response from Morrus about the proposal subforum?
I'm not really able to say much besides "not really."

Theres actually more than a few issues that have been killed in committee that I'm trying to make reperations about.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Thomas Hobbes said:
<snip>
As for e-mail addresses, recently (I know not when) you stopped being able to view people's e-mail in their profiles, which you used to be able to do. <snip>

That's why I'd rather people email me for character approval. I like the job, but, honestly, what's to stop someone from playing an unapproved character? Not a lot, considering there are quite a number of unapproved characters running about.

Rocco-DM please send me an email or post your email address or something. That is, unless you want revise your guy into a telepath (something I was going to suggest to you, along with the Thrallherd psionic prestige class, perfect for a puppet master guy). Besides the issues Uriel (thank you, btw) has mentioned, there are other omissions (minor but important) that need taking care of.

Note though that psionic domination sucks compared to magickal domination. The duration is by concentration now. The telepath is good at other ways to screw with the mind though. For a puppet master guy, a bard is pretty good.

Okay, enough rambling from me. But first, I'd like to thank those people who email me for their characters' approval. It makes my job a lot easier. Thanks guys and gals, I appreciate it. :)

Creamsteak said:
What's vetting?

I think she meant Vetoing... or that's the proper word for veto-ing and I know less english than I thought.
 
Last edited:

Vet: To subject to thorough examination or evaluation. One vets a manuscript.

Linguistically related to "vetrinarians", I think.
 
Last edited:

I've gotta see if I can get a broadband connection set up over here. I'm trying to get all the links together for updating the thread, but I keep getting disconnected...
 

Psionics in LEW?

Creamsteak: I heard from Nimisgod that you are willing to launch a psionic adventure to introduce psionics to LEW. I'd be more than happy to play in it, though it seems I'm kind of late for that.

Having said so, please send me a msg anytime there is an open slot for a psionic character. There is a build I've been dying to try and this kind of games is the perfect place to test it. :D
 

Alright, I'll keep that in mind. Just watch the Red Dragon Inn, as I'll be having an adventure start there soon.



Alright, if I could direct everyone's attention to my new sticky thread organization. Please look at the Guide thread, and tell me what to add (preferably by stating exactly what you would say, so that we can examine that and copy and paste it into the thread if it's good). Then, once we've shaped that thread, I'm going to start the reconstruction of some of the basic top-level mechanics of LEW, but that has to come second to the construction of this guide thread.
 

Creamsteak said:
Alright, I'll keep that in mind. Just watch the Red Dragon Inn, as I'll be having an adventure start there soon.

Sounds great. I hope we can get to see my Wilder roaming around the LEW world some day soon :cool:
 

DM-Rocco said:
.
There are rules in the DMG for oversized weapons, prices and such. I imagine he would get a -4 to hit but if that is distruptive than I can take it back to a greatsword, like I said, I got bored and stumbbled across some fun rules.

Yes the DMG has rules for oversized weapons. As per the PH, you incur a -2 to hit using an oversized weapon without the feat, not a -4.
As well, you don't have the correct damage mod from strength, which would be x1.5.
You have +5/6 Raging listed for Str bonus, when you should have +7/9 raging.
Just trying to help.

-Uriel
 

Post removed due to the fact that I am sometimes a Jackass...

That is all.

Ron/Uriel


*********************************************************
CS: In regards to your game, I was kidding. I know that you just had a very busy School season, as well as the fact that we were waiting for Argent to see if he was going to xcontinue playing on ENWorld.
 
Last edited:

nimisogd, I sent you two emails now at nimisgod@hotmail.com , if that is not the correct address then please just say so. I am not trying to be difficult or anything. You can e-mail me if you choose, CEROCCO@AOL.COM , yes, I have an AOL account, I know it sucks, but I am to lazy to change it.

Uriel, as always, thanks for the info, I forgot about the whole x1.5 strength thing and I don't know why, but I thought it was -4, but I like -2 better, thanks.

WizWrm, thanks for the link, I had that link the other day, but I must have deleted it from my favorites, good to have it again.

So, opinions please, I wanted Robillard to just be a great leader character with a high CHR and a lot of CHR based skills, so that is why I made him a rogue, for the skills, but with creamsteak opening the rules for psionics, he can also have cool powers based off of his high CHR, like the puppet master style of player. So, in everyones opinion, what do you think would be the best dominator style class, bard, wizard, psionicist? I would say that laster becuase you can use the powers more often, at least under the old rules, I haven't looked at the new rules yet.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top