Disdain for new fantasy

GreatLemur said:
Oh, man, believe me: What's he's describing is extremely anime. This character type (or character role, maybe) is almost ubiquitous in action/fantasy anime. Wherever you've got one big-eyes, spiky-haired, boisterous dude, there's always got to be his rival/antagonist with narrow eyes, long hair, and a calm (often standoffish) demeanor.

GreatLemur knows what he is talking about. The Shadowcaster screams this to me because its a dark, silent, negative, fashion-conscious version of a popular archetype.

If you watch 1) more recent 2) higher quality anime, you won't see as many of these pairings. Or at least they won't be quite as obvious as they used to be. But if you watch classic anime, this pairing is so constant that it is quite predictable. You recognize the characters the moment they walk on stage. If you've got a noisy, super powered hero, the moment a character walks on who doesn't like the hero and who, for just a moment, you think might be a girl dressed up as a guy, that's the rival. You can set your watch by him.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Wolverine almost fills this role in the X-Men. There you've got Cyclops, the heroic one, who's in love with Jean Grey. Then you've got Wolverine, the negative dark rival of Cyclops, who doesn't like him personally and is also in love with Jean.

Now, if this were a boys anime, there'd be a few small changes. Cyclops would fight in physical combat, be highly impulsive, and a poor planner. He'd continue to be leader even though totally unsuited for the job, because in boys anime enthusiasm is better than tactics. He would also be the strongest combat X-Man hands down. Jean would love him for his idealism, not his sense of responsibility.

Meanwhile Wolverine would be replaced by Gambit.
 

Kesh said:
I haven't seen Naruto, Berserk or Samurai Champloo, so I can't comment there. Vegeta? Eh, not really. Vegeta was an antagonist for most of DBZ, and only fell into the "secondary hero" role around the Cell Saga storyline. There really wasn't anything mysterious or Shoujo about him at all, he was just an anti-hero at that point.

Wolfwood... maybe. I can see how he sort-of fits the role. He's certainly not more powerful than Vash, nor does he defeat him in battle. And he's anything but shoujo! He's a slick ladies-man with a mysterious past.

Generally, I don't see the stereotype in the anime I've watched. Not as described, anyway. The closest I could associate with that is Sesshomaru from Inu Yasha, and he's an outright villain rather than a secondary character.
Aw, Sesshomaru is a perfect example. This role--I swear it's so common, it's gotta have a name, but I don't know it--isn't really specific to "main character's best friend" guys; it definitely encompasses mentors, rivals, and outright enemies. I think it's more about the intended audience response than the character's actual relationship to the protagonist.

Vegeta is admittedly a long shot, because his character design is miles away from what we usually expect in this character type, and I have trouble imagining that he was created with a female audience in mind, but he seems to have turned into the type we're discussing, or something like it. He's got the whole "Initially more powerful than the cheerful hero guy and outright antagonistic to him, later beaten by the hero and becomes an ally, but still acts like a jerk" character arc, and also the female fans (however accidentally).

Good Christ, I cannot believe I'm discussing Dragonball Z.

WizarDru said:
Although again, that's not a uniquely anime archetype. Heck, the characters you just described don't fit his description. Sasuke doesn't wear trenchcoats and dress in black (he wears shorts, for heaven's sake),
Oh, I wouldn't say there's anything like a checklist of character personality or design traits to fit into the phenomenon I'm talking about. It's more of a general character tone, and a vague cluster of character elements that tend to occur alongside other character elements.

WizarDru said:
None of them sound at all like the Shadowcaster.
Well, that angle was Cadfan's thing. I can't really say for sure, but I don't think he meant that shadow-based powers were a major component of this character type. Maybe they often show up on characters with cold, aloof personalities in anime, and that'd be a reasonable connection. I won't try to make a case for it.

WizarDru said:
(As for tailoring the characters to appeal to female readers....well, not so much. While a lot of girls read Shonen Jump (it's actually the most popular manga book for girls, despite it's name), the titles they read are NOT the ones we're discussing. The most popular series for female readers are not fighting action stories like Naruto or DBZ, but comedy or suspense like Prince of Tennis or Death Note.)
I'm mostly bringing up fighting anime because that's the only stuff I've seen that's likely to have made it to American TV. And the size of a given show's female audience isn't really the issue, so much as the fact of certain characters being intended to appeal to certain tastes. You can look at a very male-oriented show like Naruto, Scryed or Flame of Recca; or a harem-anime-for-chicks like--Jesus, what was that thing--Fushigi Yuugi (only in shoujo stuff, it's the loud, hot-headed guy who sticks out, as opposed to the aloof one, and obviously the rival-to-ally character arc isn't there).

If you haven't already noticed the phenomenon, and you try to go looking for it based on a specific set of criteria, you'll probably never find it. It's not really a formula, just a general sort of stereotype, which shows up best when you hit a really clear cool guy / crazy guy pair.
 
Last edited:

Cadfan said:
If you watch 1) more recent 2) higher quality anime, you won't see as many of these pairings.
Yeah, that's why it's so difficult to give decent examples. I've watched the first episode of a whole lot of completely random anime series, and recognizing this bit is one of the many reasons I generally don't watch any further than that. I'll never remember the names of all these miscellaneous formulaic shows I only saw one episode of, just the various forumlas I began to notice while watching them.
 

WizarDru said:
Heh. With that qualifier, it's pretty much a sure bet that you haven't read any American comics in decades, unless you were reading Millie the Model or Hot Rod Racers. :lol:

He could've read G.I. Joe!

Wait...they did cross over with the Transformers in continuity*, which means aliens.

* - COBRA built Megatron a tank body. Somehow.

Brad
 

Please forgive me for not reading the whole thread.

AllisterH said:
Can anyone explain why if anything is derived from anime/WoW (even if it has a non-existent connection) it seems like there is opposition not based on the concept itself but from where it comes from?

Consider that it may be because they don't like the concept itself, but that they mistakenly expressed that as opposition to the source.

Though I generally ignore it when someone uses "anime" as a criticism. "Anime" covers so much ground it's about as useful a distinction as "cinema". I usually suspect that they mean something much narrower.
 

As an anime fan (and proud of it!) I feel I need to point out that a lot of the things people associate with anime--spiky hair, big eyes, 7-foot swords--are common to the anime shows that have become popular in the west, but don't come up in all anime shows. This goes for storyline conventions like the rival-of-hero arc mentioned earlier.

Anime is an art style, not a genre.
 


RFisher said:
Though I generally ignore it when someone uses "anime" as a criticism. "Anime" covers so much ground it's about as useful a distinction as "cinema". I usually suspect that they mean something much narrower.

Just so. Most people who use 'anime' as a derogatory term traditionally are referring to 'shonen' series, such as Dragonball Z, Naruto or Inu Yasha. I'm pretty sure none of them are referring to Master Keaton, Wind of the Bodyguard, Egg of the Angel, Darker than Black, Junkers Come Home, Death Note, The Skull Man, Michael or a host of shows and styles that don't fit that mold. Which is effectively like saying that you don't like movies because you didn't enjoy "Terminator 2" or "Die Hard". It's a valid opinion to have, but it raises eyebrows from folks who know there's more out there than that.

That many anime series begin as manga first, where there's an even greater variety of material, only makes things seem a little more disjointed.
 


Remove ads

Top