Whizbang Dustyboots
Gnometown Hero
Depends on if they bought me dinner first.Dave Turner said:Would you be similarly aggrieved about WotC "innovating" on you? :\
(Maybe "innovating" means something different in Common.)
Depends on if they bought me dinner first.Dave Turner said:Would you be similarly aggrieved about WotC "innovating" on you? :\
Also, keep in mind, there are more DMGs to come. They'll probably have less "beginner" stuff in them.Mouseferatu said:People have to learn the game somewhere, folks. And requiring beginners to buy more than longterm fans is, frankly, just stupid business.
The game should hand-hold beginning DMs. It's how they learn to be experienced DMs. And the DMG--the first DMG--is absolutely the book to do it in.
Obviously I completely disagree.Mouseferatu said:People have to learn the game somewhere, folks. And requiring beginners to buy more than longterm fans is, frankly, just stupid business.
The game should hand-hold beginning DMs. It's how they learn to be experienced DMs. And the DMG--the first DMG--is absolutely the book to do it in.
BryonD said:The game has worked without this baby treatment for a very long time. It doesn't need to go there now.
I have a hard time seeing a non-gamer going: "Oh, it has a starter town!!! Let's play."Mouseferatu said:And for most of that time, one of the biggest concerns among those in the industry is the difficulty in expanding the market base beyond the smallest niche.
If making the game--the core game--more beginner-friendly provides even a tiny chance of making it easier to draw (or keep) new players, and particularly new DMs, then I have no problem with a handful of pages that will be "wasted" on the more experienced players.
Are they going to do a good job? Or just throw a "handful" of pages at it?Mouseferatu said:handful of pages that will be "wasted"
BryonD said:I have a hard time seeing a non-gamer going: "Oh, it has a starter town!!! Let's play."