If you're a truly lawful good character you'd return the $500 anyway because it is the right thing to do, not because of the reward.I think this PC got short-changed.
It's like seeing a poster that says "Missing: $500. Reward for return: $100."
If you're a truly lawful good character you'd return the $500 anyway because it is the right thing to do, not because of the reward.I think this PC got short-changed.
It's like seeing a poster that says "Missing: $500. Reward for return: $100."
a) The PCs didn't know it was +3. All they knew was it was a rune-scribed Skandik (Norse) spear.
b) The PC was double specialised in Bardiche - 1e rules: +3 to hit & damage and Attack 3/2, ie better with a mundane bardiche than with a +3 spear.
c) IRL if you return $500 you'll get a $50 reward, if you're lucky.
d) Them's the breaks.
Ouch.d) Them's the breaks.
Good point--and another reason why I prefer Neutral Good or Chaotic Good.Kerranin said:If you're a truly lawful good character you'd return the $500 anyway because it is the right thing to do, not because of the reward.
If you're a truly lawful good character you'd return the $500 anyway because it is the right thing to do, not because of the reward.
Ouch.
I was only semi-serious. I have had PC's temporarily use powerful magic items and give them up to the proper owners.