Does a publisher/author's interaction here influence your purchases?

Does a publisher/author's actions here influence your purchases?


Status
Not open for further replies.
eyebeams, were I to start accepting outside work for publication I would not be accepting yours. Because I can't trust you. I cannot trust anyone who exhibits the hostility you do.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

mythusmage said:
eyebeams, were I to start accepting outside work for publication I would not be accepting yours. Because I can't trust you. I cannot trust anyone who exhibits the hostility you do.

This is the third time I have used the Report function.
 

mythusmage said:
eyebeams, were I to start accepting outside work for publication I would not be accepting yours. Because I can't trust you. I cannot trust anyone who exhibits the hostility you do.

I'm thinking that this would only be a problem if you (a) expected that you would not pay him for his work, (b) expected to use his work without permission, and (c) expected that you would ignore his requests for information about what you were planning on doing about (a) and (b).
 

Roudi said:
Its a fault of perspective. Some of us only see the face presented to us on the messageboard. We haven't had the opportunity to work with you or deal with you under different circumstances. If we had, some of us might have a lot better opinions of you.

That's not a bad point, but look at this thread, where I *am* trying to open up what is going on behind the scenes. The reply from some people is that they don't want to know and/or don't care. This is a segment of the fanbase that actually wants to be *more* susceptible to marketing than ethics or content.
 

eyebeams said:
This is a segment of the fanbase that actually wants to be *more* susceptible to marketing than ethics or content.

And again, still ain't true and still missing the point.
 

eyebeams said:
That's not a bad point, but look at this thread, where I *am* trying to open up what is going on behind the scenes.
That's a good point, but the "inside perspective" really shouldn't be coming from a 3rd party. Your bias is obvious and understandable.
 



GMSkarka said:
Bryon, I'm not going to argue with you.

You were already warned about your behavior towards me recently, and, whether you believe it or not, I'd rather not encourage a situation that will get you banned, even temporarily.

I'm confident that I understand exactly what has been asked of me, it has been discussed off-line.
Thanks for your concern though.

If you think it was perceived as a one way thing, you are fooling yourself to your own loss.



Truth remains.
 
Last edited:


Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top